Saffa73 definitely isn't an ordinary 1500 player. He has given me two serious whoopings when I was black and my white games required magnificent endgame play on my end; wins which I probably earned simply because I put more time into analyzing them. I don't know if he is 2000+ worthy here. But he is at least a 1700+ caliber player here. Good luck in your quest Saffa73; and just keep putting the aholes on ignore.
Originally posted by z00tAre you saying that I am trying to progress in an 'Unacceptable manner'?
I was trying to do a PORK PIE accent in (http://www.phill.co.uk/comedy/desmond/) seeing that you have elephant skin to how to progress in an "acceptable manner".
Just how is this unacceptable?
And unacceptable to you? Others on here?
Originally posted by tmetzlerCheers, mate.
Saffa73 definitely isn't an ordinary 1500 player. He has given me two serious whoopings when I was black and my white games required magnificent endgame play on my end; wins which I probably earned simply because I put more time into analyzing them. I don't know if he is 2000+ worthy here. But he is at least a 1700+ caliber player here. Good luck in your quest Saffa73; and just keep putting the aholes on ignore.
Can we get this thread back on track, please.
Not that I want to steer away from the argument over my playing strength etc. lol
If anyone has an issue with that, feel free to message me or start a thread.
This thread is about players who accept invites then delete them deliberately for no apparent reason.
Thanks.
Originally posted by tmetzlerSo he was simply having a bad day losing 770 games to 1400-1500s? If his challenges for 1400-1600 are not being deleted, but those where he is up to 400 points lower are being deleted, what conclusion can you draw?
Saffa73 definitely isn't an ordinary 1500 player. He has given me two serious whoopings when I was black and my white games required magnificent endgame play on my end; wins which I probably earned simply because I put more time into analyzing them. I don't know if he is 2000+ worthy here. But he is at least a 1700+ caliber player here. Good luck in your quest Saffa73; and just keep putting the aholes on ignore.
Ok, I put another 6 games up there, and before you can say boo, some ^%$%^( has accepted 5 of them and deleted them all instantly.
Time to name and shame...
^%$%^( 1 ( 4 accepted and 4 deleted ) - Xanthos NZ
^%$%^( 2 ( 5 accepted and 5 deleted ) - mgbal
I know it's not ideal to name here, but I want you all to know who I am talking about.
I am sending feedback too.
Originally posted by z00tI think it would class as harrasement. I'm not sure whether that's against the rules, but it should be.
No infringement of the rules has been done in deleting the invites so sending feedback is pointless. As your ego does not allow you to set invites for players up to 200 points of your rating, you will have to learn the hard way.
If a 1000 rated player specified 1500+ rated players I wouldn't accept just to delete them.
Originally posted by z00tUmm I disagree.
No infringement of the rules has been done in deleting the invites so sending feedback is pointless. As your ego does not allow you to set invites for players up to 200 points of your rating, you will have to learn the hard way.
If one is accepting then deleting invites deliberately, then this may constitute harrassmnet which is against the TOS.
Originally posted by saffa73I offered you a game but you deleted it so presumably I am not good enough for you to play. ðŸ˜
Ok, so I am supposed to beat 1500 ranked players and get to 2000 that way???
Pointless. If I win most of those games then lose the odd one then my rating will just plummet.
I am good enough to beat 2000 plus players on here if I play to my potential ( I am curently rated at 2065 ELO OTB ).
Suspected of cheating for playing to my actual rating? Whatever.
Originally posted by saffa73Of course it's harrassment. If they are doing it to intentionally annoy you.
Umm I disagree.
If one is accepting then deleting invites deliberately, then this may constitute harrassmnet which is against the TOS.
Which in your example appears to be the case.
Anyone who says it's not, is daft.