Originally posted by Freddie2006Stop it,he's not impersonating anyone.
6. MEMBER CONDUCT
You agree to not use the Service to:
Impersonate any person or entity, including, but not limited to, RHP staff, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity;
He was just answering a question.
1 edit
Originally posted by Freddie2006This is a RHP rule. Challenging the player is not the way to handle the rules. The best way is too inform the powers that be in a discreet manner. Laws used to deal with idenity theft could cause some legal problems for somebody claiming to be another person. You are not even allowed to put a CH in front of your dog's name if he is not a champion .
6. MEMBER CONDUCT
You agree to not use the Service to:
Impersonate any person or entity, including, but not limited to, RHP staff, or falsely state or otherwise misrepresent your affiliation with a person or entity;
Originally posted by gambit3Is there any evidence fifththingy is not an IM? I don't think so, at the moment this feels like a scene from The Crucible.
This is a RHP rule. Challenging the player is not the way to handle the rules. The best way is too inform the powers that be in a discreet manner. Laws used to deal with idenity theft could cause some legel problems for somebody claiming to be another person. You are not even allowed to put a CH in front of your dog's name if he is not a champion .
Originally posted by LundosFor the respect of the thread, fifthdivision, and the time that he went through to analyze this game, can we PLEASE get back to the subject at hand and discuss the game?
Lol.
Stop harrasing the new guys. Who cares if he is an IM or not. As long as his advice is sound its all good?
Originally posted by RagnorakAll of whites pieces need to be active for him to win the game and so the rook must get infront of the pawns. So which is faster, Ra3-c3 or Rd1-d3-c3?
Can you clarify this some more? I'm not sure I understand your point re the gain of tempo with Ra3.
D
Originally posted by Mephisto2Morozevich is one of my favourite players. He plays very sharp and triggers wild tactics when he is on the offensive or defensive.
And I seconded that out of curiosity, triggered by the authoritarian tone of the analysis shown. For instance:
"6. Bc4!
I believe the sozin to be the best way to deal with the najdorf. I think the only way for white to obtain a meaningful advantage in the opening is to immediately take advantage of the loss of time of a6 with rapid development and a ...[text shortened]... like Moro) invariably play 6.Be3 or 6.f3. Do they lack the positional insight to play 6.Bc4?
Giving a move an exclamation mark doesn't discredit all other moves and make them bad, it just shows what this player considers the absolute best move in the position. After all, Fischer once gave 1. e4 an exclamation mark, but does that mean that all of the grandmasters that played 1. d4 against him didn't have the positional insight to play the "better" 1. e4 ? I don't think so.
Originally posted by fifthdivisionWow, brilliant game, black was in trouble after 12.Ne6!
All of whites pieces need to be active for him to win the game and so the rook must get infront of the pawns. So which is faster, Ra3-c3 or Rd1-d3-c3?
That move forces black into a defensive position and not even fritz was able to get a strong attack started. Trading your inactive rook for fritz's only developed piece was a move that at first looked shocking, but is really very basic. These are the types of moves that I miss/fear to make, and this game is a great example of why TO make these moves. Many people on here can learn the lesson that there are many advantages which a player can take advantage of, not just material. I hope that you post more of these and don't get discouraged by the pestering for "proof of your IM title".
Originally posted by cmsMasterYou'll see in my notes that I think black is flat out losing after 9. ... Nxe4 ! 12. Ne6 is, believe it or not, a book move, and I believe it to be, of course, the best move in the position. Thank you for the compliment, I was thinking of just stopping posting my analysis because it has obviously offended some people, but I think I will continue it if at least some people appreciate it.
Wow, brilliant game, black was in trouble after 12.Ne6!
That move forces black into a defensive position and not even fritz was able to get a strong attack started. Trading your inactive rook for fritz's only developed piece was a move that at first looked shocking, but is really very basic. These are the types of moves that I miss/fear to make, and thi ...[text shortened]... post more of these and don't get discouraged by the pestering for "proof of your IM title".
Originally posted by fifthdivisionYes I appreciate it, and did read your notes. After 9...Nxe4 I'll agree that white is still holding his advantage, but there are some players that could argue that black has chances yet. I also saw that 12.Ne6 is a book move and was surprised by this for 2 reasons. First, piece sacrifices are hard to come by in opening book lines (excluding many King's Gambit lines, like the Muzio) and second, because black actually allows it! After this move white has a firm control of the initiative and hassles black's king while gaining another advantage with development. Once again, I appreciate your analysis and apologise, on behalf of others, for the huge number of off topic posts in this thread.
You'll see in my notes that I think black is flat out losing after 9. ... Nxe4 ! 12. Ne6 is, believe it or not, a book move, and I believe it to be, of course, the best move in the position. Thank you for the compliment, I was thinking of just stopping posting my analysis because it has obviously offended some people, but I think I will continue it if at least some people appreciate it.