Go back
Bad Chess Books

Bad Chess Books

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by gaychessplayer
I have read many excellent books by Eric Schiller.

"Encyclopedia of Chess Wisdom" is an excellent resource as a comprethensive outline for use by chess teachers.

"Gambit Opening Repertoire for White" and "Gambit Opening Repertorie for Black" both contain many interesting opening ideas.

I think that Schiller gets a bad rap. The only problem that I've noticed with virtually all of his books is extrremely poor proofreading.
Are you nuts. I tried reading the Gambit Repitoire for white and incomplete doesn't even begin to describe it. I admit he chose a huge topic, but the book is basically worthless.

Vote Up
Vote Down

(Almost) anything by Ray Keene.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Anything by Bill Robertie.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by zebano
Are you nuts. I tried reading the Gambit Repitoire for white and incomplete doesn't even begin to describe it. I admit he chose a huge topic, but the book is basically worthless.
I've won many blitz games using many of the variations analyzed in that "basically worthless" book.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Art of Positional play by reshevsky.
I was getting into it, until one game that had an illegal move, and near the end too. No way to figure out what happend, so i tried to sell it on ebay...no dice.
Most of Andy Soltis's books.
Shiller writes books like he's on barbituates, or coke.
Blitz Theory by Maxwell. Terrible..just playing blitz, you could learn whats in this book, without the 2 dollar words
I cant remember more..because i sold them on ebay in a bulk auction

Vote Up
Vote Down

I liked the Chess Docter, but I am only a 1700 player.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Falco Lombardi
Anything by Bill Robertie.
I SECOND THAT!

and his books have typos too...

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Grandmouster
Most of Andy Soltis's books.
The more Soltis I read, the more vehemently I must disagree. His Why Lasker Matters, which I'm reading now, is quite good. His Rethinking the Chess Pieces is terrific.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Wulebgr
The more Soltis I read, the more vehemently I must disagree. His Why Lasker Matters, which I'm reading now, is quite good. His Rethinking the Chess Pieces is terrific.
hence the "most of" comment.
I cant get into his style.
I prefer mendis, or seirawan, or chernev over sotis anyday

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.