09 May '08 01:31>
Back to the books. I agree they are ok, in fact almost the best thing that people can do for their chess game. Obviously, according to the rules of this site they are not illegal, and grumbling about that is pointless. I'm just pointing out that using the books to compare play during the game seems exactly the same as engines.
AFTER and BEFORE games, study of openings etc. or even study of game principles during a game (it is not in direct reference to your position, but to ideas you must apply, ie endgame analysis) is all great.
Opening from the book where you have a clear tactically sound analysis of your position 12-20 plies deep during the game is not using your brain, and I feel is cheating. At that point it is no longer correspondence chess but directed chess, until you go out of the book.
Then again, with this argument I have a problem looking at memorizing entire lines of openings with all variation and playing like that, how that would differ. There it still isn't applying the ideas you learn, just following directions... So despite my instant recoil, I'm still fighting toward my opinion on correspondence as a whole. Mainly: what counts as correspondence? (obviously I think the opening from the book wouldn't, just as having capablanca over my shoulder telling me what to do wouldn't be correspondence)
AFTER and BEFORE games, study of openings etc. or even study of game principles during a game (it is not in direct reference to your position, but to ideas you must apply, ie endgame analysis) is all great.
Opening from the book where you have a clear tactically sound analysis of your position 12-20 plies deep during the game is not using your brain, and I feel is cheating. At that point it is no longer correspondence chess but directed chess, until you go out of the book.
Then again, with this argument I have a problem looking at memorizing entire lines of openings with all variation and playing like that, how that would differ. There it still isn't applying the ideas you learn, just following directions... So despite my instant recoil, I'm still fighting toward my opinion on correspondence as a whole. Mainly: what counts as correspondence? (obviously I think the opening from the book wouldn't, just as having capablanca over my shoulder telling me what to do wouldn't be correspondence)