15 May '11 09:55>2 edits
Originally posted by nimzo5ok Nimzo, thats helpful, i get it now. A technical player is one who applies this technique, interesting. I always, feel robbed when that happens to me. Why should someone win just because they have better technique? Its almost an injustice. where is the creativity, the imagination? the taking of risks, calculated and otherwise? Meh, its machine like and monotonous. There should be some rule that your not allowed to win like that or you only get three quarters of a point and one and a half if you mate your opponent outright, with no pawn promotions.
I struggle with the notion that Gelfand is a relatively weak tactical player.
Robbie- I think a technical player would generally mean someone who seeks to trade their middle game advantage into endgame victories. Dvoretsky's "Technique for the tournament player" is pretty much on that subject. Kamsky in many ways seems to be the most "technical" player in the candidates despite Kramnik's reputation. Just my .02 on that though.