25 Mar '13 11:38>2 edits
Originally posted by RJHindsPlease be reasonable.
On the following website is given the analysis of the games for the candidates for the World Championship:
http://london2013.fide.com/analysis/index.html
I was interested in looking at the round 8 match between the two leaders Aronian and Carlsen and noticed that the Houdini 2.0c x64 computer chess engine is being used for the evaluation analysis. Eac ...[text shortened]... ppears to me that both players have a high matchup rate with this Houdini computer chess engine.
The first seven moves belong to the opening.
Nobody ever tried to nail a computer user because the opening moves fit. It is in the nature of openings, that they repeat and well analysed.
Thus when analysing computer assistance the analyser is giving only values for moves after the longest recorded game with that move order....
EDIT I went to the analysis and the 365openings database knows 377 games with the move order leading to that game. Both players stayed on the most popular line until move 13, when Radjabov selected a move as black which is only 6 times in the databse (83 % white wins) instead of the short rochade which was chose 65 times in the database. Only in the 14th move Radjabov selected a move, not contained in that one.