Cant believe im reading this... worst chess adv...

http://www.ezinearticles.com/?Winning-Chess-Strategies&id=241631

Enough said.

Originally posted by Caro Kann
http://www.ezinearticles.com/?Winning-Chess-Strategies&id=241631

Enough said.

Gee, and I thought chess was so hard, but now I see the light! Just read the article, and you're an instant GM! 😀

Originally posted by Caro Kann
http://www.ezinearticles.com/?Winning-Chess-Strategies&id=241631

Enough said.

Originally posted by point
Whoever wrote that had to be a little tike. Give the kid a brake.

Originally posted by point
Whoever wrote that had to be a little tike. Give the kid a brake.

Bear in mind however, that (for the intended audience at least), 4-move mates are a wining stratgedy.

Seems to ignore the moves that the opponent may make- problematic approach. Strange article- develops from the very general to the overly specific in a few paragraphs. Who is the intended audience?

Looking through some of his other articles, he seems to be offering a lot of 'advice' on many different subjects, citing his website as some experience (with a severe lack of content).

How can you not take any of these seriously.
http://ezinearticles.com/?DVD-Players-Information---A-Must-Read&id=241958
http://funandgamessite.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=27
http://ezinearticles.com/?Develop-Your-Learning-Style&id=240333

What doesn't this man have a good background in? His talents put Bawmann to shame.


The whole Scolars Mate is probably best left for players to discover themselves (I did) as you think about the moves, then realise it not worth bothering with as opponents get better.

Originally posted by Caro Kann
http://www.ezinearticles.com/?Winning-Chess-Strategies&id=241631

Enough said.

The author used to play at RHP, had an 1800 rating, and was a frequent forum poster.

Boy that article is hilarious. Sounds like something a 600 would write. If he was rated 1800 on here, he must of used a cheap computer program to do it.

Hee hee hee that article is so stupid everytime I'm bored I'm going to read it to get a good laugh

Originally posted by Caro Kann
Did you not read the bottom? He called himself a "master"

Master at what? Chess or phycilogical experiments to see if people will believe him?