Go back
Cant believe im reading this... worst chess adv...

Cant believe im reading this... worst chess adv...

Only Chess

Vote Up
Vote Down

http://www.ezinearticles.com/?Winning-Chess-Strategies&id=241631

Enough said.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Caro Kann
http://www.ezinearticles.com/?Winning-Chess-Strategies&id=241631

Enough said.
lol, my 8 yr old sister could have wrote that piece of garbage!!! im going to print that page out just so i can use it to wipe my butt next time i let loose!!!!!

Vote Up
Vote Down

Gee, and I thought chess was so hard, but now I see the light! Just read the article, and you're an instant GM! 😀

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Caro Kann
http://www.ezinearticles.com/?Winning-Chess-Strategies&id=241631

Enough said.
Whoever wrote that had to be a little tike. Give the kid a brake.

1 edit
Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by point
Whoever wrote that had to be a little tike. Give the kid a brake.
lol, oh really, well i went back to the site and went to the authors page and at the top it said this

Jakob Culver - EzineArticles.com Expert Author

lol

here is the url - http://ezinearticles.com/?expert=Jakob_Culver

he is an expert author!!! lol, that's hilarious

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by point
Whoever wrote that had to be a little tike. Give the kid a brake.
Did you not read the bottom? He called himself a "master"

Master at what? Chess or phycilogical experiments to see if people will believe him?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Bear in mind however, that (for the intended audience at least), 4-move mates are a wining stratgedy.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Seems to ignore the moves that the opponent may make- problematic approach. Strange article- develops from the very general to the overly specific in a few paragraphs. Who is the intended audience?

Vote Up
Vote Down

Vote Up
Vote Down

Looking through some of his other articles, he seems to be offering a lot of 'advice' on many different subjects, citing his website as some experience (with a severe lack of content).

How can you not take any of these seriously.
http://ezinearticles.com/?DVD-Players-Information---A-Must-Read&id=241958
http://funandgamessite.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view&id=12&Itemid=27
http://ezinearticles.com/?Develop-Your-Learning-Style&id=240333

What doesn't this man have a good background in? His talents put Bawmann to shame.


The whole Scolars Mate is probably best left for players to discover themselves (I did) as you think about the moves, then realise it not worth bothering with as opponents get better.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Caro Kann
http://www.ezinearticles.com/?Winning-Chess-Strategies&id=241631

Enough said.
You mean I can't believe everything I read on the internet?? 😛

Vote Up
Vote Down

The author used to play at RHP, had an 1800 rating, and was a frequent forum poster.

Vote Up
Vote Down

Boy that article is hilarious. Sounds like something a 600 would write. If he was rated 1800 on here, he must of used a cheap computer program to do it.

Hee hee hee that article is so stupid everytime I'm bored I'm going to read it to get a good laugh

Vote Up
Vote Down

Originally posted by Caro Kann
Did you not read the bottom? He called himself a "master"

Master at what? Chess or phycilogical experiments to see if people will believe him?
masterbater.

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.