Hi Plopzilla
"Maybe GP can shed some light on the best line after 3.Nf3"
I wish I had all the answers, if I did I would not sharing them on a chess forum. 😉
Keeping things at our level. Yes 3.Nf3 has the advantage that it is playable
and not what Black expected. There is an excellent chance they will have
only booked up on 3.Nc3 and already are on their own.
I have a 2004 book on this opening. It is called
The Centre Counter by
Andrew Martin. it has 6 of the 134 pages on 3.Nf3 the majority on 3.Nc3.
The GM Kurajica game Pacifique posted is an excellent model to follow.
(not memorise...follow the idea. aim to 0-0-0 and mix it.)
Martin recs 3...Nf6 as the move with a whole set of different ideas.
My feeling is Black (at our level) will not when faced with 3.Nf3 go for the
Kurajica line because it involves a Nc6. (it is a good and playable move).
They will be warned fairly frequently about the dangers of not leaving
their Queen out on a limb and the need to supply a bolt hole with c6.
(even though here the Queen is on d5 they fully expect a Nc3 and to play Qa5).
Here after 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. d4
Martin gives 4...c6 a !
And this small amount of book knowledge is the reason why I have over
40 examples on the 1400 DB of Black playing here
after 1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nf3
3...c6 a nothing non-developing move.
-------------------------------------------------
You want a line v the Centre Counter. How about 4.b4
Now don't go jumping into an opening book to look at it.
All you will see is soul destroying, confidence sapping refutations,
they won't mention the 56% v 42% plus white has with it on here.
Why look at moves you won't see.
Play it as you see it, make it up as you go along, you are tossing a wing pawn
for big kicks on the Queen. Make that the theme of your game.
You have tossed one pawn so dont be afraid to toss in another and another...
...why not you have lost the never to be seen ending. Have confidence, have fun.
(the truth in chess seekers never have any fun. When the fear of losing overcomes
the fun of simply playing the game, it's time to give up.)
One RHP example. dagi - Fizzer RHP 2010
Black's 5th move. Something we are all guilty of.
A crude example of knowing a little when infact we are much better
off sometimes knowing nothing. (all the more reason not to look at the
bool ref to 4.b4.)
1. e4 d5 2. exd5 Qxd5 3. Nc3 Qa5 4. b4 {It's the Mieses Gambit.} 4... Qxb4 5. a4 {A fresh idea. It has Ba3 plans.} 5... c6 {Hello. There is that c6 move that Black was 'told' he 'must 'play in the 3.Nc3 variation. 5...Nf6 Develop and if 6.Nb5 Qa5 and c6 comes with a tempo.} 6. Nf3 Bf5 7. Rb1 Qa5 8. Rxb7 {Pawns back (boo, not in the spirit of the opening) but a Rook on the 7th. (hooray)} 8... e6 9. Nb5 {Nice and tricky dicky. 9....cxb4 10.Bb5+ Kd8 11.Ne5 with checks on f7 possible Nc4 ideas. This is fun.} 9... Na6 {So Black defends c7.} 10. Nfd4 Be4 11. Qh5 {And that is that, Black resigned, The threat of Qxf7+ and Nd6+ winning the Black Queen are tough to meet.}