d4 is better than e4

This whole thread is useless.

If d4 was better than e4/c4/Nf3/other then everyone would play it.

Give It A Rest...


FixarN

Originally posted by gaychessplayer
I've had some success in blitz chess with 1 e3 (which is called Vant Kruy's Opening)

I've had success with it too in online blitz, but when I play it, it was a mouse slip.

I am backing up for 1.g3. not a bad move at all...

Originally posted by Murad
OMG guyz it is so easy to make most of you so mad for an stupid opening threads. Anyone who goes like"the maker of this thread is clearly an IDIOT" is an IDIOT like YUGOslav.

I don't remember capitalizing "idiot..."

give me valid proof that e4 is inferior and i'll be your slave for 10 years.

Originally posted by Jusuh
I am backing up for 1.g3. not a bad move at all...

We have been here before..

1. g4 is simply the best!

Originally posted by Murad
Because:

d4 makes it harder to defend for black because
after 1......d5 you have moves like
2.c4 cool queens gambit
2. e3 good as well
and after 1...Nf6(which sucks)
its proved that whites position is a bit better

p.s to DRAGON FIRE (Never??) PROVE IT!!!! BITE ME! uhhhhh

Queen's Gambit isn't even a real gambit (2. ...dxc4 3. Qa4+) and it isn't that hard for black to equalize (or get close to it) in the QGD.

2. e3 is unambitious, slow, and silly and makes it easier to for black, not harder...

1. ...Nf6 doesn't suck and is perfectly fine (and the King's Indian is way cooler than the Queen's Gambit) and if you think d5 is better because of the queen's gambit...
well...after 2. c4 e6 3. Nc3 d5, oh look it's a QGD

but you don't care about any of this because your just out to try and piss people off and and attempt to look intelligent (wth @ buying deep blue...)

Originally posted by YUG0slav
but you don't care about any of this because your just out to try and piss people off and and attempt to look intelligent (wth @ buying deep blue...)

and all his doing is showing everyone what a f****** a******* he is.

Edit: Excuse my "French"!

e4 or d4? They're both completely fine. The one thing I think d4 has that e4 doesn't is that Black can play Center Counter against e4. I think there's a 1 d4 e4, but I can't think of the name.

e4 and d4 are both great moves. I learned that e4 was better from the books I read to learn chess. I think because e4 opens up KB, allowing Kingside castling quicker, and Kingside's supposed to be safer.

Either way is fine. You can't say e4 is better than d4 or vice versa.

Originally posted by Murad
Right ....I will give 50 bucks if you are gonna make with:

1.d4!! f5????????????????????????????????/
....
....
....
..
43. qh7#

Ill play when you got an opening, feel free to send a challenge then

Originally posted by Murad
look at my discriptionz

you have none, i checked...

hey Murad, Bobby Fischer is angry at you!

http://img163.imageshack.us/img163/2056/angryfischerdq0.jpg

Originally posted by Murad
Right ....I will give 50 bucks if you are gonna make with:

1.d4!! f5????????????????????????????????/
....
....
....
..
43. qh7#

honestly, if my opening is so inferior, how come you hant started it yet (i sent the challenge because you have an opening finally.)

Originally posted by Murad
Because:

d4 makes it harder to defend for black because
after 1......d5 you have moves like
2.c4 cool queens gambit
2. e3 good as well
and after 1...Nf6(which sucks)
its proved that whites position is a bit better

p.s to DRAGON FIRE (Never??) PROVE IT!!!! BITE ME! uhhhhh

Nf6 simply sucks yet is the most popular move by most of the Worlds Top Grandmasters, players such as Fischer and Kasparov have time and time again resorted to their Grunfeld's and crushed.

By the way, do any of you even have real ratings?

Originally posted by wannabeshiro
By the way, do any of you even have real ratings?

Yes!