Originally posted by DeityNot at all, but I should mention that I was playing a weak opponent. My Sicilian games usually take about 30 moves.
I love the sicillian, when I started using it I was completly dominating with it. Just recently I feel restricted when playing it.
Im probably just doing something wrong.
I will look into this, thanks guys, for backing it up.
Mind posting your game exigentsky?
[Event "ICC 2 12"]
[Site "Internet Chess Club"]
[Date "2007.03.11"]
[Round "-"]
[White "him"]
[Black "me"]
[Result "0-1"]
[ICCResult "White resigns"]
[WhiteElo "1481"]
[BlackElo "1686"]
[Opening "Sicilian: Hungarian variation"]
[ECO "B27"]
[NIC "SI.43"]
[Time "22:50:34"]
[TimeControl "120+12"]
1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 g6 3. d4 cxd4 4. Nxd4 Bg7 5. Bc4 Qa5+ 6. Nc3 Qc5 7. Bxf7+
Kxf7 8. Qf3+ Nf6 9. Be3 Qh5 10. Qf4 e5 {White resigns} 0-1
Originally posted by DeityDo it. 😉
I dunno, the sicillian just doesn't seem to work anymore, its more of the defensive type of position these days.
I think I should switch to 1. e4 e5 rather.
I might be wrong though.
Whats your thoughts on the sicillian?
Maybe I should consider studying it further before going with e5...?
Originally posted by DeityThat's a good one, passive sicilian. If anything, the sicilian often leads to wild attacking games
Im talking just about all of them, ive seen games that just go into passivity, and I cant play like that.
It's rare that someone takes the initiative from the sicillian, atleast from my point of view, im hoping someone can prove me wrong though.