I thought i'd share this gem of a game. It all looks so natural, white goes up a pawn and skilfully simplifies the position in to a MASSIVE position advantage in the end game. Smyslov forces black to neutralise his own position and traps the opposing king on the 6th rank, all of that... with one rook!
Originally posted by pdunneClick on "Headers" below the game (or on "PGN" ), and it'll tell you. This was played in Groningen (in the Netherlands) in 1946, at the Staunton Memorial. This was the first major international tournament after World War II. Smyslov's opponent was Milan Vidmar.
When and where was this played, and against whom?
Richard
What a great game. I think studying his games in depth is a great way to learn chess in general, but it is really a great way to learn endgames. It's fun, not work, when seen in the context of his games.
The only down side is that he reached a point in his career where he would win a pawn or a pawn's positional equivalent, and the other guy would just resign, knowing it was hopeless, and leaving us with nothing to study except the notes!
Originally posted by Paul LeggettI've recently started teaching and i am actually giving a lecture on this game tomorrow precisely because it is so instructive. It is an excellent example of deciding on a strategy and executing it (ie, white is a pawn up, simplify the position into a won ending).
What a great game. I think studying his games in depth is a great way to learn chess in general, but it is really a great way to learn endgames. It's fun, not work, when seen in the context of his games.
The only down side is that he reached a point in his career where he would win a pawn or a pawn's positional equivalent, and the other guy would just resign, knowing it was hopeless, and leaving us with nothing to study except the notes!
Also, there are some excellent individual moves, 8.Qh5 for example is an excellent use of an intermediary move. White weakens the black squares and then develops threats utilising the weakened squares. 18.Re8 is another, white allows the Queen exchange but continues to develop (black is still enjoying a lead in development after the earlier attacks on whites Queen). I think this move really makes a massive difference to whites cause. 20.Bf4 also, white has levelled in development and can only now seek exchanges, black is happy for BxN as it un-doubles his pawns so leaves his knight. White is patient and manoeuvres his knight to d2 before exchanging which wins the game on the spot. Logical, simple chess, executed brilliantly! Love this game 🙂
Originally posted by greenpawn34I couldn't tell you i'm afraid, have never read that one. Found it online 😉
This game was brought up in conversation last night.
Is that game included by Smyslov in his My Best Games of Chess - 1935-1957?
I committed the sin of sins by lending out my copy years ago.
Never lend out chess books, you never see them again.
Originally posted by Siskin9.Qh4 really makes a better try that 9.Bxe5 in the first game. Having looked at the whole game, you have to say white was rather lucky to win this one!
Here's an interesting game in the same line from two years before the Smyslov game
[pgn][Event "URS-ch13"] [Site "Moscow"] [Date "1944.05.29"] [Round "6"] [White "Boleslavsky, Isaak"] [Black "Tolush, Alexander V"] [Result "1-0"] [ECO "C64"] [PlyCount "138"] [EventDate "1944.05.21"] [EventType "tourn"] [EventRounds "17"] [EventCountry "URS"] [Source "Chess Kxb4 66. Nb1 Kb3 67. Kxg6 Kc2 68. Na3+ Kb3 69. Kf5 Kxa3 1-0[/pgn]