Originally posted by MarinkatombOh well, at least you tried... 😳
Trolling is not what i come here for, i've used this forum for years as it is a great forum, free from bickering, name calling and general internet junk. That said, i'm done trolling now and will happily return to benign use of this forum and talk only about chess. Duchess, please feel free to discuss chess with me at your leisure, you're welcome here, but please, for the love of GOD, drop the wounded animal charade.
2 edits
Originally posted by Fat LadyMarinkatomb you're an amateur at this lie telling game, I tell you an AMATEUR
Duchess64, writing as "Nick Bourbaki", used to pollute the now largely defunct chess newsgroups with thousands upon thousands of lines of drivel. Any time spent attempting to respond to him/her is time wasted. It really is a great shame that this person has ended up on RHP.
http://www.chessbanter.com/rec-games-chess-misc-chess/6022-nick-bourbakis-many-lies.html
They even came up with the nickname "Nick-the-liar". I'm going to have another pant wetting episode.
1 edit
Originally posted by thaughbaerIts gonna get *roasty toasty* for old Nick 😵
Marinkatomb you're an amateur at this lie telling game, I tell you an AMATEUR
http://www.chessbanter.com/rec-games-chess-misc-chess/6022-nick-bourbakis-many-lies.html
They even came up with the nickname "Nick-the-liar". I'm going to have another pant wetting episode.
On topic with OP, i'd like to say that I wasn't even aware of a women's olympiad until recently... Am I right in saying that womens chess, just like in many other sports, have a lack of interest and general following?
That would be a shame, as players like Judit polgar have proven to play at a similar level to the elite in the mens game.
Is it not possible that the olympiads of the future could combine men and women, and have bigger teams? Say 3 men and women per team?
Your thoughts on that please.
(p.s. fighting over nothing gets you nowhere... I used to be on a poker site that had a forum, which eventually got closed down because a full scale war had escalated between members, which just cast a real negative image across the site.... suppose if people new to the site came in and saw all this? Would they want to join?... Think about it)
1 edit
Originally posted by Fat LadyInteresting. Explains a lot.
Duchess64, writing as "Nick Bourbaki", used to pollute the now largely defunct chess newsgroups with thousands upon thousands of lines of drivel. Any time spent attempting to respond to him/her is time wasted. It really is a great shame that this person has ended up on RHP.
I agree. It's a shame such a person is on this great site.
Originally posted by Fat LadyThere is no doubting these two are the same person, the style is unquestionably identical. I hate to state the obvious Duchess, but who's the liar now? Guess you're not a woman after all...
Duchess64, writing as "Nick Bourbaki", used to pollute the now largely defunct chess newsgroups with thousands upon thousands of lines of drivel. Any time spent attempting to respond to him/her is time wasted. It really is a great shame that this person has ended up on RHP.
Originally posted by Marinkatombso we have a guy pretending to be a girl sticking up for womans rights? or is she a woman who was pretending to be a man on another chess site? or do we have a norman bates type who is half and half? what ever he/ she/ it ... busted...
There is no doubting these two are the same person, the style is unquestionably identical. I hate to state the obvious Duchess, but who's the liar now? Guess you're not a woman after all...
Originally posted by Fat Ladygbaway to the rescue!
Duchess64, writing as "Nick Bourbaki", used to pollute the now largely defunct chess newsgroups with thousands upon thousands of lines of drivel. Any time spent attempting to respond to him/her is time wasted. It really is a great shame that this person has ended up on RHP.
Originally posted by Fat LadyI thought drivel was all they had in those newsgroups.
Duchess64, writing as "Nick Bourbaki", used to pollute the now largely defunct chess newsgroups with thousands upon thousands of lines of drivel. Any time spent attempting to respond to him/her is time wasted. It really is a great shame that this person has ended up on RHP.
Anyway, I'm not totally sold. Nick actually used smileys - the big dopey ':-)' kind.
Originally posted by Fat LadyWhy can't i rec this twice?? No fair! ðŸ˜
Duchess64, writing as "Nick Bourbaki", used to pollute the now largely defunct chess newsgroups with thousands upon thousands of lines of drivel. Any time spent attempting to respond to him/her is time wasted. It really is a great shame that this person has ended up on RHP.
1 edit
Originally posted by MarinkatombIts even more intriguing than that, Nick Bourbaki, is, as fatlady will tell you, is the
There is no doubting these two are the same person, the style is unquestionably identical. I hate to state the obvious Duchess, but who's the liar now? Guess you're not a woman after all...
pseudonym for a group of French mathematicians! I myself feel no animosity towards
Duchess64 whatsoever and actually quite like his/her posts, when they refrain from
being abusive.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieAnd to think I was fooled into thinking she/he was a high class broad. 😳
Its even more intriguing than that, Nick Bourbaki, is, as fatlady will tell you, is the
pseudonym for a group of French mathematicians! I myself feel no animosity towards
Duchess64 whatsoever and actually quite like his/her posts, when they refrain from
being abusive.