01 May '11 20:05>
I really don't think opening analysis, even deep analysis is going to cause a problem.
If I were going to look for comp cheats, I would look at endgames...
If I were going to look for comp cheats, I would look at endgames...
Originally posted by Paul LeggettPaul.
"So just grabbing 20 odd games and running them through a box is
only half of it. You need access to everything he has played else you
could be matching up to someting he played two years ago, went wrong, boxed it, found the correct path and stored it for a later day.
There is nothing wrong in that. "
The italics were added by me, becaus ...[text shortened]... f their losses in future games), but you guys have really clarified the issue.
Paul
Originally posted by ZygalskiI'm sorry if I was vague, but I wasn't really referring to this kind of analysis- I was just surprised that we could use computer analysis in our opening prep, and then use the prep here, as long as the prep was done BEFORE the game and not as part of the game in progress.
Paul.
The way you can do this type of analysis is this:
1) select 20 games which are found to have 20 or more non multi-million game database moves. I use www.chesslive.de for instance.
2) select games vs high-quality opponents. I use 2200+ rateds on chess.com, but the ratings pool is a bit lower in figure here, so I use 2000+ RHP.
3) choose the mos P than all the benchmark data, then you are left with the question why this may be the case!