1. Joined
    28 Mar '10
    Moves
    3807
    05 Jan '11 15:19
    Taken from Chess' december issue.Not too difficult but I like it because it's funny and engines are useless.

    White to move mates in 1


    toet.
  2. Standard memberatticus2
    Frustrate the Bad
    Liverpool
    Joined
    01 Nov '08
    Moves
    92474
    05 Jan '11 15:33
    You're right. Not hard, once you see it. And fun too. Bet many won't see it tho 😲
  3. Lagos
    Joined
    27 Mar '09
    Moves
    7219
    05 Jan '11 15:38
    Pal, are you sure this is a mate in 1? I can't seem to find it. Please post the solution. Thanks.
  4. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    05 Jan '11 15:39
    Originally posted by Goshen
    Pal, are you sure this is a mate in 1? I can't seem to find it. Please post the solution. Thanks.
    Yes, there is a mate in one.
    Think once more.
  5. Lagos
    Joined
    27 Mar '09
    Moves
    7219
    05 Jan '11 15:41
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    Yes, there is a mate in one.
    Think once more.
    Haha!!! I finally got it!! It's so not obvious! Great!
  6. c6
    Joined
    19 Dec '04
    Moves
    7355
    05 Jan '11 15:49
    Very cute, although the solution is a little deceptive given the amount of information provided.
  7. Joined
    19 Jun '06
    Moves
    847
    05 Jan '11 15:53
    Yeah, engines can only work with what they're given. If you set up the conditions properly in the GUI, almost all engines will find it instantly.
  8. Lagos
    Joined
    27 Mar '09
    Moves
    7219
    05 Jan '11 15:56
    So why did Mr. Toet write that engines are useless?
  9. Joined
    19 Jun '06
    Moves
    847
    05 Jan '11 16:04
    Originally posted by Goshen
    So why did Mr. Toet write that engines are useless?
    Because most engine operators wouldn't think to set up the proper condition when inputting the FEN into the GUI.
  10. Donationketchuplover
    Isolated Pawn
    Wisconsin USA
    Joined
    09 Dec '01
    Moves
    71169
    05 Jan '11 16:112 edits
    nvm
  11. Joined
    28 Mar '10
    Moves
    3807
    05 Jan '11 16:13
    Once you realise the proper conditions you wouldn't need the engine 🙂

    And yes,there's some trickery.Heck,it's mate in 1,without a trick it's not worth looking at.

    It's a creation of J.Perkins btw.Unknown to me but I'm not a keen problemist

    toet.
  12. Donationketchuplover
    Isolated Pawn
    Wisconsin USA
    Joined
    09 Dec '01
    Moves
    71169
    05 Jan '11 16:151 edit
    The bishop blocks the mate! Knight blocks other mate!
  13. Standard memberPalynka
    Upward Spiral
    Halfway
    Joined
    02 Aug '04
    Moves
    8702
    05 Jan '11 16:491 edit
    I can't see it. 😞

    Edit - Saw it.
  14. Joined
    12 May '09
    Moves
    2779
    05 Jan '11 17:03
    Often in this kind of problem, there is a way to prove what black's last move must have been. Is this the case here?
  15. Joined
    12 May '09
    Moves
    2779
    05 Jan '11 17:07
    Originally posted by Zaubernuss
    Often in this kind of problem, there is a way to prove what black's last move must have been. Is this the case here?
    To answer my own question, I think the answer is yes. I'll leave it to others to fill in the details.

    Nice problem!
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree