23 Nov '05 17:42>
I have heard that in developing your chess you should learn tactics , then endgames, then openings. So what's the wbest way to improve your endgame?
Originally posted by lukemcmullanIf you cannot quickly deliver checkmate with a queen and king against a lone king, and if you cannot with certainty convert the last pawn on the board into that queen (when theoretically possible--and you must know the difference), then tactics in the opening and middle game are the only chance you have.
I have heard that in developing your chess you should learn tactics , then endgames, then openings. So what's the wbest way to improve your endgame?
I started with Irving Chernev's The 1000 Best Short Games of Chess, and by learning to aggressively attack the king, quickly grew stronger than my school peers. However, the success I experienced with my recklessly aggressive play cultivated some bad habits that must be broken in order to move to the next level, and I've been an average player a terribly long time.[/b]I am intrigued with your starting with Chernev's Best Short Games. I am a terribly conservative player and need to learn to be more aggressive. Are you recommending Chernev's book, or recommending AGAINST it?
Originally posted by bassoSimply stating a fact. It was the first chess book that I read, and I have not read it since. That was 30 years ago.
I am intrigued with your starting with Chernev's Best Short Games. I am a terribly conservative player and need to learn to be more aggressive. Are you recommending Chernev's book, or recommending AGAINST it?
Originally posted by lukemcmullanI really liked "Chess Endgame Lessons" by Pal Benko. It is out of print, and has been for some time, but you can still find a copy occasionally on places like eBay.
I have heard that in developing your chess you should learn tactics , then endgames, then openings. So what's the wbest way to improve your endgame?