Originally posted by Pacifique
Our game will be the first robbie.
there you go my man, it took me all of about 20 minutes to annotate our game,
about the same amount of time it took to play it, have fun, i did!
Robbie the Awesome v Pacifique the Patzer King
[Event "Challenge"] [Site "http://www.timeforchess.com"] [Date "2012.02.10"] [Round "?"] [White "robbie carrobie"] [Black ""] [Result "0-1"] [WhiteElo "1628"] [BlackElo "2222"] [PlyCount "54"] [EventDate "2012.??.??"] 1. e4 c5 2. Nf3 e6 {hmmm, ...e6, at this point i remembered a Fischer game in my mind, against Sherwin i think it was, when he played a Kings Indian set up against this move, normally i would play d4, but i dont know enough about it myself.} 3. d3 Nc6 4. g3 g6 5. Nc3 {this move is not typical of Kings Indian , the knight should belong on d2 to protect the queen, but, as there is no immediate danger of the d file opening it seemed to me that Nc3 was a more active square} Bg7 6. Bf4 {an unusual post for the bishop, i cant think why i didn't play it to e3 which would have seemed more normal, perhaps i had visions of Nb5 and the knight coming into d6.} d6 7. Bg2 Nge7 8. O-O e5 {at this point i know I have a stonewaller on my hands, how banal i was thinking, clearly i must open the position with f4} 9. Bg5 h6 {i was hoping for ...f6 but my opponent was not willing, pity that.} 10. Be3 O-O 11. Qc1 {targeting the h pawn.} Kh7 12. Nd2 { a brilliant move, here i had planned, Nc4 and Nb5 ganging up on the vulnerable d pawn and also preparing the way for f4} Be6 13. f4 {i dont know why i didn't continue with my cunning plan of Nc4 and Nb5} f5 14. Bh3 {mmm, cant really say why i played this move, i think its simply because the bishop is undefended , my opponent replied, Misunderstood your last move. Obviously too artificial without any real threats. I said nothing.} Qd7 15. Nc4 fxe4 {ouch my opponent exploits the inaccuracy of my last move, i will now have weak light squares all around my king} 16. Bxe6 Qxe6 17. Nxe4 {this looks a dubious move but because of the obvious fork, but i didn't think it was possible because of the undefended nature of blacks queen, ...d5 and the knight simply goes to c5 with a tempo on the queen} exf4 {here my opponent stated, You are playing too fast for this time control. Tactics, tactics & tactics.. I had to bite my tongue and refrain from telling them to please be quiet} 18. Bxf4 d5 {the move that i did not think was possible, but obviously my opponent had seen the move 19... Bd4+ way back on move 14 when i played 14.Bh3, uncanny tactical vision. Here they stated, We can try some games in blitz room. This game seems to be decided anyway as I`m not playing so fast to make stupid blunders. I said nothing.} 19. Nxc5 Bd4+ 20. Be3 Rxf1+ 21. Kxf1 Qh3+ 22. Kg1 dxc4 23. Bxd4 Nxd4 24. Qe3 Nef5 25. Qe4 Rf8 26. g4 Nh4 27. Qxb7+ Kh8 {and i had had enough, what did i learn, not to play cc at blitz speed and that one inaccurate move against tactical geniuses and i am walking the plank.} 0-1
03 Mar '12 18:062 edits
Q vs Morgski, part 2
Back to Top