Some people on this site infuriate me. I win one game against someone with a higher rating than I, and I am suddenly cheating? That is what some people think. I refer you to Game 1712455
he resigns and messages me saying I am cheating. Before you run your mouth people, think logically, what is the fun in cheating? There isn't, therefore why would I play the number of games that I have? As well, if I were using a program, why wouldn't I win every almost every game? Just some points to ponder before one of you mindlessly accuses someone...
Originally posted by prosoccera) Why did he resign?
Some people on this site infuriate me. I win one game against someone with a higher rating than I, and I am suddenly cheating? That is what some people think. I refer you to Game 1712455
he resigns and messages me saying I am cheating. Before you run your mouth people, think logically, what is the fun in cheating? There isn't, therefore why would I almost every game? Just some points to ponder before one of you mindlessly accuses someone...
b) From that game, I can safely say you were not using an engine, your play was not good enough (no offence meant of course).
Originally posted by prosoccerno way in tazmania u were using an engine 😕 . . . take the win and pat urself on the back for making less critical errors than ur opponent and attaining victory 😏 ....
Some people on this site infuriate me. I win one game against someone with a higher rating than I, and I am suddenly cheating? That is what some people think. I refer you to Game 1712455
he resigns and messages me saying I am cheating. Before you run your mouth people, think logically, what is the fun in cheating? There isn't, therefore why would I almost every game? Just some points to ponder before one of you mindlessly accuses someone...
..... no offense in my first comment of course 😉
Originally posted by prosoccerHe should blame his blunders, not his opponent. 16. ... dxc3 was obvious and winning for black.
Some people on this site infuriate me. I win one game against someone with a higher rating than I, and I am suddenly cheating? That is what some people think. I refer you to Game 1712455
he resigns and messages me saying I am cheating. Before you run your mouth people, think logically, what is the fun in cheating? There isn't, therefore why would I ...[text shortened]... almost every game? Just some points to ponder before one of you mindlessly accuses someone...
Originally posted by prosoccerThere isn't a huge difference in your ratings anyway, i's not as if he is rated 350 points more than you ( I have lost myself to opponents rated that much lower than me and didn't say anything as I could see it was my blunders that cost me the game), I haven't analysed the game and do not have any software to do so anyway. But there is a lot of paranoia over the use of engines, I went through it myself after learning I was beat in 2 finals of a tournamnet by someone subsequently booted off this site for engine use.
Some people on this site infuriate me. I win one game against someone with a higher rating than I, and I am suddenly cheating? That is what some people think. I refer you to Game 1712455
he resigns and messages me saying I am cheating. Before you run your mouth people, think logically, what is the fun in cheating? There isn't, therefore why would I ...[text shortened]... almost every game? Just some points to ponder before one of you mindlessly accuses someone...
once again a pretty ridiculous claim from a paranoid bad loser. the game was filled with moves worsening the position with over half a pawn. white walking right into discovered attack against his queen, trying to survive with 14.Ba4+?? losing a piece for 14...Kf8 (should've been 14.Nd5), which black missed countering with 14...Nd7. 15.Bxd7+ misses another half a pawn to 15.Ne4. 16.Qh5 loses a pawn. 17...O-O loses a piece, which white misses. 18...d3+ 'clever check' black loses another piece...
you know, I'm not even going to look further. it was typical 1300-game for both. pieces dropping left and right, filled with sub-optimal moves (which any engine would've caught in an instant). I don't know if black resigned because he thought you were using an engine, or because he lost yet another piece with 21...Qb5, but claiming engine-use in a game like this is just ridiculous.
Originally posted by stevetoddWell, there are men on this site who suck it up after a loss and try to learn from it, and then there are little boys on this site who are so convinced they can't make a mistake that they must accuse others of cheating in order to save their egos...
There isn't a huge difference in your ratings anyway, i's not as if he is rated 350 points more than you ( I have lost myself to opponents rated that much lower than me and didn't say anything as I could see it was my blunders that cost me the game), I haven't analysed the game and do not have any software to do so anyway. But there is a lot of paranoia ov ...[text shortened]... eat in 2 finals of a tournamnet by someone subsequently booted off this site for engine use.
Originally posted by wormwoodHey, if you think 1300 pointers play bad with pieces going here and there, why not challenge me and defeat me (if you can)? 🙂 (No offense intended, just saving the grace for the 1300's which include me)
once again a pretty ridiculous claim from a paranoid bad loser. the game was filled with moves worsening the position with over half a pawn. white walking right into discovered attack against his queen, trying to survive with 14.Ba4+?? losing a piece for 14...Kf8 (should've been 14.Nd5), which black missed countering with 14...Nd7. 15.Bxd7+ misses another h other piece with 21...Qb5, but claiming engine-use in a game like this is just ridiculous.
PM if you are ready for the game.