Originally posted by TyrannosauruschexWho would talk about looking childish, after threads in which you have showed yourself so much 😀
And, as a consequence, waste alot of time and space in a forum supposed to be for chess.
You seem oblivious to the fact that this is making you look equally childish - like the kid who wont stop screaming until people do what he says.
Originally posted by schakuhrBut I have said numerous times that it should stop, and he just carries on. I am not going to let him keep going anymore - he has abused other players for years now, but I am a different kettle of fish and am not going to give him that satisfaction anymore.
I'm already there and I've watched the thread. I cannot say Korch is being nice (basically you and him are just exchanging insults) but at least his arguments make some sense.
Originally posted by KorchYou have entered into this as whole heartedly as anybody. It is becoming a real farce now - almost like a pantomime, where the characters are saying. Oh yes he did, Oh no he didnt. OHHHH yes he did. OHHHH no he didnt.
Who would talk about looking childish, after threads in which you have showed yourself so much 😀
Can you not see that?
I don't think this thread should have been created. Repetitive draw offers are annoying (especially premature draw offering in tournaments), and in OTB chess they could lead to discussions with tournament or club management. But here, just ignoring them is good enough, no? Nothing else can be done about it, unless there are real insults accompanying the moves (for which the feedback tools are available). Now with the discussion in this thread there is a risk that the outcome of the games will tend to 'prove' one party' wrong' and the other 'right', and there is no ground for that.
Originally posted by TyrannosauruschexYour desparate tryings to base your positions are funny 🙂
You have entered into this as whole heartedly as anybody. It is becoming a real farce m n otnow - almost like a pantomime, where the characters are saying. Oh yes he did, Oh no he didnt. OHHHH yes he did. OHHHH no he didnt.
Can you not see that?
But you`re right that I`m wasting too much time for you and for this thread. So I`m not gonna waste my time at least for this thread now, as people have clarified their opinions.
Originally posted by Maxwell SmartMy argument is a very simple "do not discriminate"
Your argument here is completely nonsense. It isn't even amusing.
When you work on the idea that racists are lesser men than the rest of us, you are discriminating against them for no good reason. The majority of racists don't hurt anyone. Do not discriminate.
2 edits
Originally posted by KorchWell at least we have agreed on something. Hopefully this thread can be forgotten about....and i get my draw 😛
Your desparate tryings to base your positions are funny 🙂
But you`re right that I`m wasting too much time for you and for this thread. So I`m not gonna waste my time at least for this thread now, as people have clarified their opinions.
1 edit
Originally posted by TyrannosauruschexFrom the Department of Just Thought I'd Mention It:
It is only offensive to you, because you play the c3 sicillian and claim to be a brave player - white takes almost no risk whatsoever in that opening, and anybody who has faced or plays it would agree with me.
Both An Opening Repertoire for the Attacking Player by Raymond Keene and David Levy, and An Attacking Repertoire for White by Sam Collins recommend the 2 c3 Sicilian. Please note that both books have the word "attacking" in their titles, so at least some strong players believe that the 2 c3 Sicilian is a valid attacking weapon.