people dont give a guy a chance because he is new. i could either be really good or really bad so why not give it a shot. weyerstrass is good but doesnt mean he can't lose. if u dont already know it has happend. maybe not on this site but i have beat him before so maybe you shouldn't judge a book by its cover
Originally posted by Ramnedlol.. I think it's funny that some people think that Fritz produces perfect chess games time after time. bunch of losers. (or in this case singular.)
Dude don't even try. Using a computer (Cheating by the way - ratings do not matter and they shouldn't raise self esteem. engine users are the biggest geeks I've come across...) won't work, as he is too good. Unless you are a Master you will lose π
Originally posted by unbeatable12You're simply not better than weyerstrauss. He's an international CC master and isn't gonna lose to some untitled player (which I'm certain you are judging by your handle).
i also think it is funny that people think you need to cheat in order to beat weyrestrass. also how does age have to do with chess? and also i dont play with legos so looks like your out of luck there
edit- I assure you that if you are good enough to legitimately challenge the guy, you'll get your day soon. On the other hand I sincerely doubt you're stronger than me, let alone a master.