1 edit
Originally posted by rubberjaw30still thinkin tactically 🙂. look at your king...... do u wanna keep that or your queen? I'll ask you that later.
ok, so eventually, you threaten a knight fork on c7, I put queen on a5, and I should pull out ok.
edit - I'm actually full of potato... there are too many moves to look at.
I'll move when I'm convinced... shouldn't take too long 🙂.
... You made it past move 8 this time 🙂.
Originally posted by ih8sensif you make me sleep on this kind of anticipation, I'll have to kill you in your sleep...
still thinkin tactically 🙂. look at your king...... do u wanna keep that or your queen? I'll ask you that later.
if you've got it worked out, then do it already...
I can't find a single GM game with b5 in it, so it probably isn't sound, so your move will probably be correct, so do it already...
like I said... I'll kill you!!
muahahahaha
MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!
MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Originally posted by rubberjaw30the problem wasn't to little pieces it was too much! these pieces should have been counter attacking instead of using up the flight squares of the king. I learned this from Steinitz if you think that I am wrong read "The Middle Game: Static Features in Chess"
Fritz gave the go ahead on pawn f6?
that created the g6 weakness that you so brilliantly exploited...
also, black's king wound up on the wrong side of the board (f6 was bad enough, castling into that mess?!? that was worse.
look objectively at black's piece placement with respect to the black king...
black has virtually no space, and all the pieces t ...[text shortened]... the important concepts of the game, and how to punish the opponent when he/she fails to do so.
Originally posted by tomtom232you said the same thing I did, with different words...
the problem wasn't to little pieces it was too much! these pieces should have been counter attacking instead of using up the flight squares of the king. I learned this from Steinitz if you think that I am wrong read "The Middle Game: Static Features in Chess"
obviously, Black has no space, he's just too cramped!
I said that this crampedness did not allow the defensive cavalry toi arive, and you say that this spaceless-ness kave the king no flight...I say this: would the king need any flight if there was sufficient defense there? by the way, rugby rocks.
Originally posted by rubberjaw30you are the one that contradicted yourself not me. What is it he is cramped or he doesn't have enough defenders cramping him up?
you said the same thing I did, with different words...
obviously, Black has no space, he's just too cramped!
I said that this crampedness did not allow the defensive cavalry toi arive, and you say that this spaceless-ness kave the king no flight...I say this: would the king need any flight if there was sufficient defense there? by the way, rugby rocks.
Originally posted by tomtom232i'm not looking for generalizations about the position.. everyone sees it. No offense to u guys by the way.. just don't get self righteous.. we need lines.
you are the one that contradicted yourself not me. What is it he is cramped or he doesn't have enough defenders cramping him up?
Originally posted by ih8sensok, so I stand by my earlier remark:
i'm not looking for generalizations about the position.. everyone sees it. No offense to u guys by the way.. just don't get self righteous.. we need lines.
f6, f5 and 0-0 were the moves that pushed black's position weaker than he could save.
Originally posted by ih8sensI meant for the two parts to go together...
part 1 is right.. the french is pretty bad when you don't transpose.
I score oober high against it.
and what DON'tyou claim to score high against?
you claim to hulk out against the Kann, the French, and you're giving me all I can stand in the Sicilian...
I'm just going to go back to those nice, safe draws from the Kann, thank you very much...
🙂