6.....e5 leads to a problematic win (which I will point you to soon) after 7. Qg7 (cutting off the Black king's escape route) but I can't find a refutation (read: Rybka and Toga can't find a refutation) of Red Night's 5....Qc8. Nor can I find a refutation of 4.....e6 after 4. Ne3.
Perhaps this is a good time to mention that, although the source claims White wins, he admits there may be some holes in his analysis because of the sheer complexity of the position. Perhaps we have found a couple.
Originally posted by ThudanBlunder 6.....e5 leads to a problematic win (which I will point you to soon) after 7. Qg7 (cutting off the Black king's escape route) but I can't find a refutation (read: Rybka and Toga can't find a refutation) of Red Night's 5....Qc8. Nor can I find a refutation of 4.....e6 after 4. Ne3.
Perhaps this is a good time to mention that, although the source c ...[text shortened]... is analysis because of the sheer complexity of the position. Perhaps we have found a couple.
It is very complex. So many moves and we're asked to find the best for both players.
Qc8 looks very strong, but for awhile I was looking at Qc7!?
I will give you this, there is a lot of life in a position that at first glance looks dead lost!
Now if there is anyone out there who would like to point out why 2...Ng7 is not an excellent defense for black they should offer some proof. That means don't assume your right (giving one move and expecting everyone to applaud isn't my idea of analysis)