Originally posted by ThudanBlunder 6.....e5 leads to a problematic win (which I will point you to soon) after 7. Qg7 (cutting off the Black king's escape route) but I can't find a refutation (read: Rybka and Toga can't find a refutation) of Red Night's 5....Qc8. Nor can I find a refutation of 4.....e6 after 4. Ne3.
Perhaps this is a good time to mention that, although the source c ...[text shortened]... is analysis because of the sheer complexity of the position. Perhaps we have found a couple.
6...e5 7.Qg7 Qf8 stops the wQ from using h6. White's pieces are starting to get shut out of play now.
Now if there is anyone out there who would like to point out why 2...Ng7 is not an excellent defense for black they should offer some proof. That means don't assume your right (giving one move and expecting everyone to applaud isn't my idea of analysis)