29 Jul '12 08:02>1 edit
Originally posted by danilop" It doesn't take more than a few moves to tell a human from a machine."
I think the odds of that happening are pretty low. I've played against GMs and I've played against engines: those are completely different experiences. It doesn't take more than a few moves to tell a human from a machine. There is more than one way to play chess extremely well, and the human way is easily recognizable by humans.
Even if people began to po ess wouldn't have much trouble scoring draws and an occasional win against an engine user.
Wow!Can you teach us?
I could understand a few moves each game and then a lot of games.And even then you'd have to be a very strong player.
"a strong GM could easily provide proof that he is in fact a strong player."
Yes,but that proves nothing.Strong players can use engines too.
"But I suspect that a GM with some experience in correspondence chess wouldn't have much trouble scoring draws and an occasional win against an engine user."
I doubt it.Unless the cheat is a real weak player or doesn't let the engine run long.Or we're talking top GM's,genre Carlsen,Gelfand etc...And even they probably need to know what they're up against.
Also,if the GM would indeed beat the engine it would only make him/her more suspect.