16 Jan '13 16:08>
Originally posted by tvochess
so I'm a bit reserved about its merits π
You can't please everyone...
Long ago I played now GM Alex Fishbein when he was a young master. I was winning the game until I played 76.Rxd4? and then lost my last drawing chances when I got greedy with 80.Qxg6.
Fascinating struggle and one I will always remember.
Brad
Originally posted by greenpawn34Ah, I wondered what the heck. π Thanks GP, I'll see if that's the problem next time I get a game PGN from Brad that doesn't work.
Hi CP.
Both White and Black had their castles wrong.
I think it was because it was the letter O instead of the number 0.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieI wasn't commenting on the advice he gives, but rather on the way he presents it. I wasn't able to get an overview of his website. This has to do with structuring and layout, not with the content. But it's a personal thing. I'm glad you found something valuable in there. I couldn't.
what is it that you disliked tvochess dude? As far as i can discern the author advocated
1. making a schedule for your training
2. practice tactics everyday
3. use a real chessboard
4. when reading a book, read it more than once
5. look at all the variations etc
6. try to visualise those variations prior to playing them
etc etc etc
all sound advice
Originally posted by tvochessyeah it was a bit muddled for sure and it did lack clarity, but chess literature is like that, take Soltis book, pawn structure chess, it is supposed to read like a kind of novel but you need to go back again and again because of the variations but it contains much that is valuable.
I wasn't commenting on the advice he gives, but rather on the way he presents it. I wasn't able to get an overview of his website. This has to do with structuring and layout, not with the content. But it's a personal thing. I'm glad you found something valuable in there. I couldn't.
Originally posted by u2kraziemy friend, i produce the synopsis of my understanding to date.
So Robbie,
After 8 pages and a lot of posts, have you found the answer to your philosophical question. If you have it, share it with me.
I am trouble by Lasker's statement until I read about Magnus.
GP said some are born with it. Others discover it. But what about the rest of us who are stuck in a rut, never dig out of a whole, are there any ans the result.
For chess, we must focus on our trainings and understanding - not ratings.
Originally posted by robbie carrobieIt's because the other day you ruined with that damned ice
my friend, i produce the synopsis of my understanding to date.
Chess appears to me to be primarily concerned with the mobility of the pieces, all
other considerations are subject to this principle. We develop, to mobilise, we pin, to
decrease the mobility of our opponents chess men, we try to dominate the centre
either practically or dynamic ...[text shortened]... etter game I just finished against grandpa bobby, awesome game it was)
Originally posted by greenpawn34Wow what a great game! White doesn't play like any 1900 i've ever seen. Very controlled and rather positional. Looking at the opening i thought black had quite a nice grip on c5 and i really thought white was going to have difficulties there but white clearly had other ideas.
You read so much conflicting advice about how to improve.
What works for some may not work for others.
I don't know how anyone posting on here can really say 'this is the best way.'
Becuase if it was why are they not GM's and if it is why don't do it and become GM's.
I know 100's of good players.
When you ask how they got to become good players ...[text shortened]... 85. Kh1 Qh3+ 86. Kg1 Qxg4+ 87. Kh1 Qh3+ 88. Kg1 Qg3+ 89. Kh1 f3 90. Bf1 f2[/pgn]
Originally posted by greenpawn34its one of these instinctive moves that one makes, unthinking, mechanical, yay, a free pawn! check all checks GB, you know it makes sense π
I cannot see why the game was stopped. (timeout?) π
The was a Glasgow player who twice had this position OTB in league games and lost!
Now everyone put your hands together and clap onto the forum...Atomick.
Atomick has won that e4 Knight six times in the exact same move order.
Game 4856262 is just one example.
So Atomick has P. W.6 with ...[text shortened]... f3 d5 23. Nc5 {OOPS!} 23... Bd4+ 24. Kh2 Bxc5 {White resigned.} [/pgn]