Originally posted by tonytiger41
violation? it was a small unimportant technicality, wasn't it?
anyway, fuss over emails seems insignificant as well.
this is more of a power struggle between polgar and the entrenched longtime board members. if you really are concerned about ethics, then you should look beyond the flaming headlines/charges.
so i ignore these charges when i question the motives of the board members who are inept and of dubious mgt/leadership skills.
What are you referring to when you say "it" was a small unimportant technicality?
As for the "fuss over emails" - this was nothing to do with a power struggle between Polgar, Truong and the longtime board members, but that is what Polgar / Truong have tried to turn it into rather than do the decent thing and own up to their bad behaviour when they were caught in the act.
It started off with Truong being caught red-handed sending the Fake Sam Sloan messages. The evidence that he did this is completely irrefutable to any rational observer.
So Truong was caught sending the obnoxious Fake Sam Sloan messages. He seems to have done this partly to wreck any chance the real Sam Sloan had of getting re-elected to the board (though frankly this seemed unlikely anyway) but mostly because he really detests Sloan!
What Truong should have done at this stage is 'fessed up, resigned from the board and worked behind the scenes supporting Polgar (who quite possibly didn't know what he had been doing).
Instead the pair of them, especially Polgar, starting making ludicrous claims that the evidence was faked, that everyone was out to get them because she's a woman and they're both foreigners, that the USCF wasn't being run properly and was going to go bankrupt etc. etc. Basically anything they could use as a smokescreen to the original charges.
Throw into the fix the various court cases and you've got the mess that the USCF is in at the moment.
Polgar seems to still have a huge number of supporters because she is a charismatic person, excellent at drumming up publicity and not at all bad at organising chess tournaments and other events.
I assume these supporters either don't know the facts or chose to ignore them because they think she is capable of doing so much for US chess. Personally I think they could well be right, who else is capable of generating so much interest in chess in the USA?
However it can't all be swept under the carpet. Truong needs to own up to what he did, promise to be a good boy from now on and then keep a much lower profile, or better still, bugger off out of the chess world altogether.