Originally posted by wadelog
The statement that 'Horizontal motion does not oppose or counter downward forces' is not consistent with the scientific concept of orbital velocity. This states that at a certain speed (which I think would vary with altitude and other factors), the forward momentum is in balance with the downward force of gravity. Weightlessness.
So, simplistically, I would venture that the answer is a speed roughly equal to half the speed of orbital velocity.
You mean orbital velocity?
Horizontal motion does not counter downward forces, but it could very well be that the velocity with which the object is moving tangential to the gravitic forces work together to keep it at a constant altitude, although at a constant freefall, and an object moving fast enough will, in fact, escape the pull of gravity.
This is because the gravitic force would shift direction as the object moves forward, being directed at the center of the larger mass, Earth, and not because the motion itself actually reduces the force at all, because if you took a snapshot of an stable orbiting object at any time, gravity isn't being countered by any actual force.
Nonetheless, the orbital effect might should be considered here.
However, orbital velocity tends to be rather high for objects high in the atmosphere though, and close to the Earth, as any bridge would be, such a velocity would be absolutely tremendous.