Math Puzzles: Try to solve this problem

Math Puzzles: Try to solve this problem

Posers and Puzzles

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

L

Joined
24 Apr 05
Moves
3061
12 Mar 08
1 edit

Originally posted by smaia
Let ABC be a triangle where AB = BC = AC.
From A, draw a line that intersects BC at a point D.
From the AD segment, draw a 20 degrees line that intersects AB at a point E. Determine the angle DEC.
This is not an easy problem.
Hint: Try to see invisible things.
Good luck. And consider yourself a genius if you resolve it in less than 30 minutes. Don't feel bad about yourself if you don't resolve it at all.
I quickly got the same answer as Jirakon (~32.54 deg) just using a couple applications of simple law of sines. I fail to see how the problem is either all that difficult or all that interesting.

P

Joined
10 Mar 08
Moves
63046
12 Mar 08

180 deg. minus 20 degress is my ans

s

Joined
28 Aug 07
Moves
3178
12 Mar 08

Originally posted by LemonJello
I quickly got the same answer as Jirakon (~32.54 deg) just using a couple applications of simple law of sines. I fail to see how the problem is either all that difficult or all that interesting.
You are a genius.

Joined
16 Dec 04
Moves
56692
13 Mar 08

Originally posted by serigado
You are a genius.
Let him have his moment. πŸ˜‰

Smaia must have slipped out the back door when he/she realised the elegant solution does not exist. I drew an elegant diagram but that was as close as I could get. I say elegant, it was on a post-it note.

L

Joined
24 Apr 05
Moves
3061
13 Mar 08

Originally posted by TheGambit
Let him have his moment. πŸ˜‰

Serigado was pointing out that I am a genius according to smaia-ian standards.

Joined
16 Dec 04
Moves
56692
13 Mar 08
1 edit

You probably are, I can only just remember SOHCAHTOA let alone how to apply it.
All I want is an admission of err from the topic creator, many men have devoted their lives to finding a non-existent solution of elegance, we need to make sure it does not continue.


Disclaimer: If there is indeed an elegant solution I tip my hat to you smaia and offer a humble apology

c
What?

Who Wants To Know?

Joined
08 Oct 07
Moves
9686
14 Mar 08

I personally got 25.

T
Kupikupopo!

Out of my mind

Joined
25 Oct 02
Moves
20443
14 Mar 08

Originally posted by TheGambit
You probably are, I can only just remember SOHCAHTOA let alone how to apply it.
At first I didn't understand what you were referrig to :p

SOS CAS TOA here πŸ˜‰

Joined
16 Dec 04
Moves
56692
14 Mar 08

Originally posted by TheMaster37
At first I didn't understand what you were referrig to :p

SOS CAS TOA here πŸ˜‰
What does the third 'S' stand for in that?
I'm being dumb

p
Iron Pillar

Backside of desert

Joined
09 Nov 06
Moves
14828
14 Mar 08

Originally posted by TheMaster37
At first I didn't understand what you were referrig to :p

SOS CAS TOA here πŸ˜‰
I have no idea what you are refering to.

please explainπŸ™‚

s

Joined
28 Aug 07
Moves
3178
14 Mar 08
1 edit

Originally posted by LemonJello
Serigado was pointing out that I am a genius according to smaia-ian standards.
Yes, he said whomever solved in less then 30 min was a genius... πŸ™‚

For whomever gets a result different then ~32.54 :
The jirakon solution is the right, and ELEGANT one. You only have to imagine a paralell segment and use sine rule... can't be simpler.

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
14 Mar 08

Originally posted by serigado
Yes, he said whomever solved in less then 30 min was a genius... πŸ™‚

For whomever gets a result different then ~32.54 :
The jirakon solution is the right, and ELEGANT one. You only have to imagine a paralell segment and use sine rule... can't be simpler.
32.54 is NOT the EXACT answer.

If it is an approximation it is certainly NOT elegant.

The problem was flawed.

J

In Christ

Joined
30 Apr 07
Moves
172
14 Mar 08
2 edits

Here's the exact solution:

{x} = the square root of x ; *x* = the cube root of x

sinz/sin(70 - z) = sin50/sin60
sinz/(sin70cosz - sinzcos70) = sin50/sin60
sinz = sin50/sin60 (sin70cosz - sinzcos70)
sinz = sin50/sin60 (sin70cosz) - sin50/sin60 (sinzcos70)
(sin50cos70/sin60 + 1)sinz = sin50sin70/sin60 {1 - sin^2 z} ; p = sin50cos70/sin60 ; q = sin50sin70/sin60
(p + 1)sinz = q{1 - sin^2 z}
(p + 1)^2 sin^2 z = q^2 (1 - sin^2 z)
((p + 1)^2 + q^2)sin^2 z = q^2
sin^2 z = q^2/((p + 1)^2 + q^2)
z = arcsin{q^2/((p + 1)^2 + q^2)}

If you want it even more exact (that is, no trig, just radicals):
I'm not going to prove the first two of the following equations. You can show them by setting up sin3x = 3sinx - 4sin^3 x, plugging in 1 for x, and solving the cubic equation (you can get sin3 using sin(18 - 15)). The same applies to cos3x = 4cos^3 x - 3cosx.

sin1 = a = (*{s^2 - 1} - s* - *{s^2 - 1} + s*)/2 ; s = sin3 = {8 - {3} - {15} - {10 - 2{5}}/4
cos1 = b = (*{c^2 - 1} + c* - *{c^2 - 1} - c*)/2 ; c = cos3 = {8 + {3} + {15} + {10 - 2{5}}/4

sin2 = d = 2sin1cos1 = 2ab
cos2 = e = cos^2(1) - sin^2(1) = b^2 - a^2

sin4 = f = 2sin2cos2 = 2(2ab)(b^2 - a^2) = 4ab^3 - 4a^3b
cos4 = g = cos^2(2) - sin^2(2) = (b^2 - a^2)^2 - 4(a^2)(b^2)

sin54 = h = ({5} + 1)/4
cos54 = j = {10 - 2{5}}/4

sin72 = k = {10 + 2{5}}/4
cos72 = m = ({5} - 1)/4

sin50 = n = sin(54 - 4) = sin54cos4 - sin4cos54 = hf - gj
sin60 = r = {3}/2
sin70 = u = sin(72 - 2) = sin72cos2 - sin2cos72 = ke - dm
cos70 = v = cos(72 - 2) = cos72cos2 + sin72sin2 = me - kd

p = nv/r ; q = nu/r

z = arcsin{q^2/((p + 1)^2 + q^2)}

Now isn't that elegant?

s

Joined
28 Aug 07
Moves
3178
15 Mar 08
1 edit

Originally posted by wolfgang59
32.54 is NOT the EXACT answer.

If it is an approximation it is certainly NOT elegant.

The problem was flawed.
I didn't say it was the exact answer. I told jirakon did the right way, and that the exact result was around 32.54
It's the arcsin of something .

edit: Well... jirakon got it with great detail in prev post.

Quiz Master

RHP Arms

Joined
09 Jun 07
Moves
48793
15 Mar 08

Originally posted by serigado
I didn't say it was the exact answer. I told jirakon did the right way, and that the exact result was around 32.54
It's the arcsin of something .

edit: Well... jirakon got it with great detail in prev post.
I'm not having a go at either of you gentlemen.

I'm suggesting that the problem setter got it wrong and found an incorrect solution through flawed geometry.