09 Sep '17 13:09>
Originally posted by @humyI rest my case.
no it isn't a lie. The only electricity used is the small amount for the pump for pumping around the water.
Originally posted by @humyI rest my case.
no it isn't a lie. The only electricity used is the small amount for the pump for pumping around the water.
Originally posted by @joe-shmoThat tiny amount of electric used for the pump is not what causes the the actual cooling and that pump could be run on non-electric sources of energy. That's obviously what they meant by the cooling system not using electricity (no electricity used for the actual cooling element) thus it is no lie. It is a bit like saying it is a lie that a petrol car isn't an electric car because a petrol car has electric spark plugs; no lie intended by saying a petrol car isn't an electric car because, just like with this cooling system, it isn't the electricity that powers it but rather the electricity merely helps it to function.
I rest my case.
Originally posted by @humyWas there any indication this system could cool down as much as a traditional air conditioner? That would be a real breakthrough. But if you have a room at 100 degrees F and the new tech cooled it to 90, that wouldn't be so great.
That tiny amount of electric used for the pump is not what causes the the actual cooling and that pump could be run on non-electric sources of energy. That's obviously what they meant by the cooling system not using electricity (no electricity used for the actual cooling element) thus it is no lie. It is a bit like saying it is a lie that a petrol car isn't an ...[text shortened]... water
"
is all that a lie also?
-this is the physics this OP cooling system uses to cool.
Originally posted by @humy"https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_transfer"
yes it does.
This is just common physics knowledge that heat can be transferred via radiative transfer. I am NOT just making this up! I learned this at university physics. See https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_transfer if you don't believe me.
Originally posted by @humyThe effect is real, you are misunderstanding how it is accomplished.
That tiny amount of electric used for the pump is not what causes the the actual cooling and that pump could be run on non-electric sources of energy. That's obviously what they meant by the cooling system not using electricity (no electricity used for the actual cooling element) thus it is no lie. It is a bit like saying it is a lie that a petrol car isn't an ...[text shortened]... water
"
is all that a lie also?
-this is the physics this OP cooling system uses to cool.
Originally posted by @humy"Also see https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Radiative_transfer
That tiny amount of electric used for the pump is not what causes the the actual cooling and that pump could be run on non-electric sources of energy. That's obviously what they meant by the cooling system not using electricity (no electricity used for the actual cooling element) thus it is no lie. It is a bit like saying it is a lie that a petrol car isn't an ...[text shortened]... water
"
is all that a lie also?
-this is the physics this OP cooling system uses to cool.
Originally posted by @humyAnd this is also from wiki;
That tiny amount of electric used for the pump is not what causes the the actual cooling and that pump could be run on non-electric sources of energy. That's obviously what they meant by the cooling system not using electricity (no electricity used for the actual cooling element) thus it is no lie. It is a bit like saying it is a lie that a petrol car isn't an ...[text shortened]... water
"
is all that a lie also?
-this is the physics this OP cooling system uses to cool.
Originally posted by @joe-shmowhich "sentence" are you referring to and did I say/imply it was in the link?
Where "exactly" is this sentence in the link you posted?
Originally posted by @joe-shmoSo what? "blunted" doesn't mean none of it is still there and you must know that because you just said "The effect is real..."
From the same page:
"The effect is blunted by Earth's surrounding atmosphere, and particularly the water vapor it contains, so the apparent temperature of the sky is far warmer than outer space"
Originally posted by @joe-shmoin specifically what way? explain...
The effect is real, you are misunderstanding how it is accomplished.
Originally posted by @humyMe: "What is the water giving its heat off to?"
in specifically what way? explain...
Originally posted by @humyYou imply that this information specifically resides within your link.
which "sentence" are you referring to and did I say/imply it was in the link?
Originally posted by @joe-shmono I clearly didn't imply this is in the link and please don't dishonestly take my quotes out of their context.
You imply that this information specifically resides within your link.
"heat energy radiating from the ground directly to outer space without heating the atmosphere in between"
]
Originally posted by @joe-shmo-along with every atmospheric physicist, we believe, for good reason, some of the heat is radiated directly to space, yes.
You think the heat from the water is radiated directly to space.
Does it cool anything without that pump?