Originally posted by @humy
the OP cooling system relies 100% on that 6% for the cooling effect and that 6% is the only bit relevant here for it to work because it is only that part it uses. I did earlier repeatedly use the word "some" so it isn't as if you wouldn't know I knew this.
Which is greater 6% or 64%? Which mode of heat transfer has the greater bearing on the effectiveness of the technology?
the '6% one' as the other doesn't help here.
lets go over a few things.
In order for this to work all the heat from the load has to leave the system. Agree/ Disagree?
All the heat from the load is IR. Agree/Disagree?
IR is IR is IR. Agree/Disagree?
According to NASA only 6% of IR is
directly radiated to space without being absorbed by the atmosphere. Agree/Disagree?
If its too cool to give off its heat by conduction/convection with its surroundings ( which may be plausible) it is giving off nearly 100% of its heat (IR) as radiation. Agree/Disagree?
The percentage of IR radiation absorbed by the atmosphere is dependent on the temperature differential between the emitter and the absorber and the properties of the absorber. Agree/Disagree?
Again, IR is IR is IR. Agree/Disagree?
Where is the other 94% of the IR being radiated to?
That is, what makes IR radiation from this object so special that 100% is radiated
directly to space, as opposed to the average 6%?