Censorship of science is deeply troubling on many levels. At the most basic, it affronts the fundamental premises of the scientific method. Science is not static. It constantly questions, borrows from, builds on, and adds to existing knowledge. Its basic tools include formulating and testing hypotheses, documentation and replication of results, peer review, and publication.* For science to advance, knowledge must be shared. Without the free exchange of ideas, science as we understand it cannot exist and progress.
The purpose of science is to produce knowledge. If science is corrupted, what flows from it is not knowledge, but something else – misinformation, propaganda, and partial-truths.
People who support censorship are not just unAmerican, they are a threat to science. Censoring Robert Malone is a threat to science. He has dedicated much of his life to helping make vaccines.
The censoring of Malone is an attack on science. Anyone who condones that has no right to claim they respect science. They are misguided and are unwittingly helping to return society to the dark ages.
Robert Malone isn't the first scientist to allow his personal grievances to ruin his scientific reputation. Check out Dr William McBride, who discovered the thalidomide problem but later faked scientific data because he couldn't bear to be told he was wrong.
In those pre-internet days he didn't need to be censored, but the world is still struggling to cope with the World Wide Waffle. It's no longer safe to tolerate anything in the name of free speech.
@kewpiesaid Robert Malone isn't the first scientist to allow his personal grievances to ruin his scientific reputation. Check out Dr William McBride, who discovered the thalidomide problem but later faked scientific data because he couldn't bear to be told he was wrong.
In those pre-internet days he didn't need to be censored, but the world is still struggling to cope with the World Wide Waffle. It's no longer safe to tolerate anything in the name of free speech.
You mean telling the truth. Robert Malone was vaccinated, so nobody can call him anti vax. Robert Malone didn't fake any data. Fake comparison.
Robert Malone has an outstanding reputation. You just don't want to accept the truth.
@Metal-Brain It would be one thing if we thought you were actually interested in science.
The ONLY thing you are interested in is WEAPONIZING so you THINK you win.
@sonhousesaid @Metal-Brain It would be one thing if we thought you were actually interested in science.
The ONLY thing you are interested in is WEAPONIZING so you THINK you win.
Robert Malone has an outstanding reputation. You just don't want to accept the truth.
"It would be one thing if we thought you were actually interested in science.
The ONLY thing you are interested in is WEAPONIZING so you THINK you win."
You did not say "answer the post" at all. Are you losing your mind?
@sonhousesaid @Metal-Brain So answer THIS charge: You are ONLY interested in science to the extent you can weaponize science for your own political agenda's.
@Metal-Brain No, I won't play that game, since you have no interest in answering the charge or the question. You know EXACTLY what I am saying and you are just going diversionary.
You could care less about censorship, what you REALLY mean is folks with real science in their background refuse to accept the spam bait sites you THINK is supporting your position so any REAL scientists going, That link is BOGUS and filled with misinformation.
THAT you cannot EVER accept since to you the further out on the limb those so called sites go, the more you THINK their level of BS will somehow win you converts.
Hint: IT DOESN"T.
Censorship is a threat to science
05 Jan '22 02:531 edit
Back to Top