Originally posted by KellyJay
Hardly, it could show you that the design was quite something at
the beginning and started breaking down over time which causes flaws
over time to show up as well.
Kelly
An interesting proposition KJ, do you have any evidence to support it?
As far as I am aware, no cases have been found of life forms becoming less complex through time, as I think you are suggesting.
Is there any evidence of eyesight being better in the distant past than it is now? Were eyes 'built' the other way round without nerves obscuring the light-receptors in the past?
What sort of mechanism would drive this? Surely a predator or indeed prey animal with worse eyesight than its contemporaries (all else being equal) would be less likely to survive and reproduce than its more visually able peers?
Can we see anything like this happening in the wild? Are bacteria that are less able to fight our antibiotics proliferating more than those that are more resistant? Are our antibiotics becoming more effective?
As far as I am aware, the answer to all these questions is a resounding No. Indeed, quite the opposite seems to be found in every case.
Can anyone think of other ways to test KJs hypothese that we are de-evolving? Can anyone think of any evidence from the real world that would support it?
--- Penguin