Originally posted by KellyJay…1. Not really, people can make predictions with or without evolution
1. Not really, people can make predictions with or without evolution
looking at data, it happens all the time.
2. I said no, so you didn't give a place to answer two.
Kelly
looking at data, it happens all the time....
That wasn’t his question. He asked:
“do you acknowledge the fact that evolution has some predictability?" (which is also my question).
Obviously neither he nor I said nor implied in any way the absurdity that “people cannot make predictions without evolution” and you know it -you simply refuse to answer the question.
…2. I said no,.…
To which question? -you said “no” to your own question and not ours. You still haven’t answered our question.
Originally posted by KellyJayAnd this is plain wrong. Science says otherwise, and have proofs for it. This is called evolution.
We are in a created universe, when we were created we got eyes.
Kelly
The human species is not created, it is evolved. To think otherwise is blind faith, or non-existant of knowledge of evolution.
If you say that "evolution is created" then it would make more sense, but even this can be disputed.
Originally posted by FabianFnasPeople say otherwise, science isn't a being that can talk.
And this is plain wrong. Science says otherwise, and have proofs for it. This is called evolution.
The human species is not created, it is evolved. To think otherwise is blind faith, or non-existant of knowledge of evolution.
If you say that "evolution is created" then it would make more sense, but even this can be disputed.
Kelly
Originally posted by Andrew HamiltonI said, no, people make predictions evolution is a theory it does not
[b]…1. Not really, people can make predictions with or without evolution
looking at data, it happens all the time....
That wasn’t his question. He asked:
“do you acknowledge the fact that evolution has some predictability?" (which is also my question).
Obviously neither he nor I said nor implied in any way the absurdity that “people canno ...[text shortened]... ion? -you said “no” to your own question and not ours. You still haven’t answered our question.[/b]
talk to make predictions. People can view the universe and using the
data they see make predictions, they can credit evolution as getting
them to the point of saying one thing or another, but without fail it
is simply people reading data and saying what they think is all that
ever really takes place.
Kelly
Originally posted by KellyJay…evolution is a theory it does not talk to make predictions....
I said, no, people make predictions evolution is a theory it does not
talk to make predictions. People can view the universe and using the
data they see make predictions, they can credit evolution as getting
them to the point of saying one thing or another, but without fail it
is simply people reading data and saying what they think is all that
ever really takes place.
Kelly
Who said it did “talk”? predictions are simply part of the theory (as I have already have proved by the web link) and in every day English we say it “makes” predictions -this is just a way of expressing that fact.
You still haven’t answered our question -only your own.
do you acknowledge the fact that the evolution process has some predictability?
- Joined
- 07 Jan 08
- Moves
- 34575
2 edits
Enough already.
Can't this thread just die it's long since timely death and the participants just agree that they'll NEVER agree? Hmm?
Hmm? Or is everyone going to be so forelornly dogmatic that they insist upon disseminating the most trivial nuance of sight?
Do you see? Wonderful. Now move on.
Remember that the persons that this silly debate most likely affects the most - the blind - can't even see the supposed importance of your words on the screen. Bravo, all of you.
Originally posted by PBE6Close no cigar, I beg to differ if you can look at light then tell me
Close, but no cigar. BTW, there were two parts to the original statement you made.
that something occured billions/millions of years ago...why cannot
I look at the whole thing and say it is an amazing piece of design?
Kelly
Originally posted by BadwaterNo one is asking you to read this thread, go on to something else
Enough already.
Can't this thread just die it's long since timely death and the participants just agree that they'll NEVER agree? Hmm?
Hmm? Or is everyone going to be so forelornly dogmatic that they insist upon disseminating the most trivial nuance of sight?
Do you see? Wonderful. Now move on.
Remember that the persons that this silly debate mo ...[text shortened]... ind - can't even see the supposed importance of your words on the screen. Bravo, all of you.
if you do not wish to discuss it.
Kelly