1. Joined
    31 Aug '06
    Moves
    40565
    01 May '14 12:361 edit
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    How do you propose the human race could have survived 10 huge hits by asteroids that would have happened in the last 10,000 years?
    This is an excellent argument against YEC. Rec'd.
  2. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    01 May '14 12:39
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    Why don't you use your OWN brain and think about the consequences of 10 MAJOR hits to the Earth that in your delusion you think would have happened in the last few thousand years. No Egyptian cartouches, nothing carved in stone before there was writing.

    How do you propose the human race could have survived 10 huge hits by asteroids that would have happen ...[text shortened]... le could have grown crops under those conditions?

    THINK. Think with your OWN brain for once.
    Maybe it happened during the creation of the earth before man. There is no way for us to know, because it was not written down as history. Or maybe those writings were destroyed in the great flood and eartquakes and volcanos. Maybe we just haven't discovered them yet. All we can do is speculate.
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    01 May '14 13:011 edit
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    Maybe it happened during the creation of the earth before man. There is no way for us to know, because it was not written down as history. Or maybe those writings were destroyed in the great flood and eartquakes and volcanos. Maybe we just haven't discovered them yet. All we can do is speculate.
    That's your big think? You totally ignore the effects of such strikes and put it down to a time when there were no men.

    How long a period of time do you think that was, this time before men?
  4. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    01 May '14 13:04
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    That's your big think? You totally ignore the effects of such strikes and put it down to a time when there were no men.

    How long a period of time do you think that was, this time before men?
    About 5 days.
  5. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    01 May '14 13:16
    Originally posted by C Hess
    This is an excellent argument against YEC. Rec'd.
    Yes, although I can imagine albeit with great difficulty humanity recovering from just one huge hit from an asteroid 10,000 years ago, 10 huge hits? surely not! With 10 huge hits, most likely nowhere on Earth would be a place where you could possibly survive that -the initial effect esp the shock waves and the intense heat would kill you let alone the freezing cold and famine that would follow for any unlikely survivors.
  6. Germany
    Joined
    27 Oct '08
    Moves
    3118
    01 May '14 13:20
    Originally posted by C Hess
    This is an excellent argument against YEC. Rec'd.
    RJHinds is the best argument against YEC.
  7. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    01 May '14 21:18
    Originally posted by humy
    Yes, although I can imagine albeit with great difficulty humanity recovering from just one huge hit from an asteroid 10,000 years ago, 10 huge hits? surely not! With 10 huge hits, most likely nowhere on Earth would be a place where you could possibly survive that -the initial effect esp the shock waves and the intense heat would kill you let alone the freezing cold and famine that would follow for any unlikely survivors.
    There may not have been 10 huge hits from asteroids. That is all speculation and not science facts.
  8. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    05 May '14 11:36
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    There may not have been 10 huge hits from asteroids. That is all speculation and not science facts.
    So you figure this geological record is also part of the grand conspiracy to kill religion? Even though you can see the outlines of craters miles and miles wide? And finding the same rocks all chewed up and stacked half a mile deep several thousand miles away?

    All that is just another atheist conspiracy?
  9. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    05 May '14 12:16
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    So you figure this geological record is also part of the grand conspiracy to kill religion? Even though you can see the outlines of craters miles and miles wide? And finding the same rocks all chewed up and stacked half a mile deep several thousand miles away?

    All that is just another atheist conspiracy?
    evidence for just one of the big asteroid impacts;

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater

    I suppose he thinks the Tunguska event is also just an atheist conspiracy to fool people into believing the plausibility of larger impact events;

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event

    So, with this vast mass conspiracy, either billions of deceitful atheists spent trillions of dollars putting those geological features there to falsely indicate these big events happened or all the data and photographs etc are all just fake and the people that visit these sites are either silenced by being killed or hypnotized into having false memories of what they saw -and all just to discredit his particular religion that has already been discredited a very long time ago.
  10. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    05 May '14 16:45
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    So you figure this geological record is also part of the grand conspiracy to kill religion? Even though you can see the outlines of craters miles and miles wide? And finding the same rocks all chewed up and stacked half a mile deep several thousand miles away?

    All that is just another atheist conspiracy?
    Or maybe a misunderstanding.
  11. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    12 May '14 18:39
    Originally posted by humy
    evidence for just one of the big asteroid impacts;

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chicxulub_crater

    I suppose he thinks the Tunguska event is also just an atheist conspiracy to fool people into believing the plausibility of larger impact events;

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tunguska_event

    So, with this vast mass conspiracy, either billions of deceitful ...[text shortened]... ust to discredit his particular religion that has already been discredited a very long time ago.
    I wonder how many OTHER hits there have been that have been obliterated by billions of years of geology?
  12. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    13 May '14 04:25
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    I wonder how many OTHER hits there have been that have been obliterated by billions of years of geology?
    Geology as we know it today is relatively young, maybe a few hundred years old. Even if you try to push it back to any beginning ideas about geology, it could only be pushed back to the Greeks a couple thousand years ago. There is certainly not billions of years of geology to obliterate.
  13. Subscriber64squaresofpain
    The drunk knight
    Stuck on g1
    Joined
    02 Sep '12
    Moves
    59233
    13 May '14 13:15
    On the seventh day, God created evolution, so that he may reside in his comfy bed above the clouds
    and laugh at all the foolish idiots below him that argue about the mechanics behind their own existence...

    STALEMATE, B!TCHES
  14. Standard memberRJHinds
    The Near Genius
    Fort Gordon
    Joined
    24 Jan '11
    Moves
    13644
    13 May '14 23:05
    Originally posted by 64squaresofpain
    On the seventh day, God created evolution, so that he may reside in his comfy bed above the clouds
    and laugh at all the foolish idiots below him that argue about the mechanics behind their own existence...

    STALEMATE, B!TCHES
    It is all genetics, not evolution.
  15. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    13 May '14 23:50
    Originally posted by RJHinds
    It is all genetics, not evolution.
    Hinds, look at this:

    Now there is proof the Chicxulub crater caused a global cooling incident.

    http://phys.org/news/2014-05-proof-global-cooling-chicxulub-asteroid.html
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree