Originally posted by RJHindsI sent you a pm about this, the shape of galaxies, how they are arranged in the universe, the post is the best 3d map of the universe, take a look at that and take a look at the post labled seeing under 50 feet of the top of luna, that shows how ground based radar helps illuminate what happens when a Mt Everest size asteroid hits the moon and pretty much the same when it hits Earth. The ones on the moon don't get eroded by geology and weather so it shows it as it would look like on Earth just after the crash.
They can say anything in print. Why can't they show the proof?
It clearly shows splattering that results from big rocks crashing down on the surface. You can see how far ejecta goes on the moon and it is pretty much the same on Earth except for our atmosphere which modulates how much stuff gets ejected, it slows down ejecta when it gets bombarded and it is VERY significant that despite the Earth's atmosphere, the chicxulub crater in the Yucatan deposited crap 1500 feet deep as far away as Bermuda. That is a known fact. The geologists can type cast rocks and they know pretty much where one kind of rock resides and it for sure wasn't in Bermuda which is a sedimentary Island and volcanic.
Yet Yucatan rocks made it to Bermuda. And in about 30 minutes because the ejecta came out like an ICBM launch only faster.
Originally posted by sonhouseI'll have to spend more time on this to see if I can figure out what you are talking about.
I sent you a pm about this, the shape of galaxies, how they are arranged in the universe, the post is the best 3d map of the universe, take a look at that and take a look at the post labled seeing under 50 feet of the top of luna, that shows how ground based radar helps illuminate what happens when a Mt Everest size asteroid hits the moon and pretty much th ...[text shortened]... to Bermuda. And in about 30 minutes because the ejecta came out like an ICBM launch only faster.
3 edits
Originally posted by sonhouseCheck out all the underwater volcanic craters. You can see pictures on google. The chicxulub crater, believed by evolutionists to have killed the dinosaurs, is horseshoe shaped. The crater created in 1980 by the eruption of the Mount St. Helens volcano is also horseshoe shaped. What a coincidence.
I'm not worried. You will rationalize it all away anyhow.
Large horseshoe-shaped craters, open at one end, have long been noted in many volcanic regions around the world. The origin of these breached craters has been controversial, but since the landslide and eruption of Mount St. Helens in 1980, many have been interpreted by scientists as the result of a landslide.
http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/MSH/30210600_056_caption.html
Originally posted by RJHindsEr, did you not get the part where the Chicxulub crater was partially in the frigging OCEAN? That is why it is horseshoe shaped. My god, your mind cannot even follow a frigging curve and feed in the missing information. No wonder you are stuck with all that YEC bullshyte.
Check out all the underwater volcanic craters. You can see pictures on google. The chicxulub crater, believed by evolutionists to have killed the dinosaurs, is horseshoe shaped. The crater created in 1980 by the eruption of the Mount St. Helens volcano is also horseshoe shaped. What a coincidence.
Large horseshoe-shaped craters, open at one end, have ...[text shortened]... s the result of a landslide.
http://volcanoes.usgs.gov/Imgs/Jpg/MSH/30210600_056_caption.html
Originally posted by sonhouseI will take the proof of how the horseshoe shaped crater at Mount St. Helens formed by a landside in 1980 over your speculation about the unkown, anytime.
Er, did you not get the part where the Chicxulub crater was partially in the frigging OCEAN? That is why it is horseshoe shaped. My god, your mind cannot even follow a frigging curve and feed in the missing information. No wonder you are stuck with all that YEC bullshyte.
Originally posted by RJHindsLet's see. A what, one mile horseshoe VS a crater 180 MILES across. Sure, it could happen, a giant volcano.
I will take the proof of how the horseshoe shaped crater at Mount St. Helens formed by a landside in 1980 over your speculation about the unkown, anytime.
Except of the part there is no volcanic magma anywhere NEAR the Yucatan.
That asteroid hit partially into the ocean and it has been proven, much as you love your rationalizations. Pitiful really.
Originally posted by sonhouseIt is all speculation because it is all underground and under the ocean and there is no recording of what happened and when.
Let's see. A what, one mile horseshoe VS a crater 180 MILES across. Sure, it could happen, a giant volcano.
Except of the part there is no volcanic magma anywhere NEAR the Yucatan.
That asteroid hit partially into the ocean and it has been proven, much as you love your rationalizations. Pitiful really.
1 edit
Originally posted by RJHindsYou are just advertising your ignorance now. EVERYTHING to you is just speculation because you are about 1000 years behind the ball and fully intend to stay there so you have no business making science judgments.
It is all speculation because it is all underground and under the ocean and there is no recording of what happened and when.