17 Apr '11 08:26

Alexander's number and Graham's number cannot count upto my number, as my number is immeasurable.

Mathematician's can't even draw up a principle, first principle, for measuring human emotion or attitude.

My number, 'L', is for love.

I suggest there is no principle number or theory for attempting to measure this reality, and therefore claim 'L' = Mike's number, is the biggest number in what science can comprehend as a number to measure, but doesn't know how to do, nor in doing it with a computer or x and y and z theory, extract theory, statistic theory, quantum or stellar, cosmotic or any other believed measurable. Space time can't even measure this,,, although I do have a theory that shopping for shoes with a woman does in fact slow down time.

I win. 😀😀

Mike's Number (L) IS THE BIGGEST NUMBER IN THE WORLD. 😏

-m. 😉

Mathematician's can't even draw up a principle, first principle, for measuring human emotion or attitude.

My number, 'L', is for love.

I suggest there is no principle number or theory for attempting to measure this reality, and therefore claim 'L' = Mike's number, is the biggest number in what science can comprehend as a number to measure, but doesn't know how to do, nor in doing it with a computer or x and y and z theory, extract theory, statistic theory, quantum or stellar, cosmotic or any other believed measurable. Space time can't even measure this,,, although I do have a theory that shopping for shoes with a woman does in fact slow down time.

I win. 😀😀

Mike's Number (L) IS THE BIGGEST NUMBER IN THE WORLD. 😏

-m. 😉