06 Jul '19 21:38>1 edit
This post is unavailable.
Please refer to our posting guidelines.
@kellyjay saidWhich is why I keep telling you to go to phys.org and read about the new developments in science, they posted the story from beginning to end. And there are many such sites but that is my go to site for what is new in science.
This is the first I heard of it. Thank you for the information.
@sonhouse saidI book marked it and will start reading there.
Which is why I keep telling you to go to phys.org and read about the new developments in science, they posted the story from beginning to end. And there are many such sites but that is my go to site for what is new in science.
Now word is they will not try to do a repeat which is too bad.
It appears they know why it failed and a repeat could put them in the history books but that is that apparently.
@sonhouse saidExcept that Phyzzog is on about the level of Buzzfeed. Better find a real science site if you want reliable reporting. The Register would be a decent start.
Which is why I keep telling you to go to phys.org and read about the new developments in science, they posted the story from beginning to end. And there are many such sites but that is my go to site for what is new in science.
Now word is they will not try to do a repeat which is too bad.
It appears they know why it failed and a repeat could put them in the history books but that is that apparently.
@shallow-blue saidI hear what you are saying, There are some real boners written but there are a lot of different fields covered and if I find something I want to know more about, I go to the listed source.
Except that Phyzzog is on about the level of Buzzfeed. Better find a real science site if you want reliable reporting. The Register would be a decent start.
@lemondrop saidNo, we're supposed to shake our heads at the failure of the West to accomplish what the Chinese did.
@Duchess64
are we supposed to clap now?
@athousandyoung saidWhat the Chinese did? You mean put a rover on the back side of the moon, a mere half century after NASA had people walking on it?
No, we're supposed to shake our heads at the failure of the West to accomplish what the Chinese did.
The post that was quoted here has been removedI figured you would put in a punch and I was not sneering. It is well known the Chinese go after technology any way they can get it and I said I wasn't dissing Chinese science, but acknowledging the Chinese use of industrial espionage.