@wildgrass said
@Metal-Brain
Government doesn't fund things that are not a problem. Can you imagine someone claiming everything is fine but fund him more so he can verify government is wasting money funding a non problem?
I thought we were in agreement that global warming is happening. If so, then we have a problem.
[quote]How is he to get funding for decades to come for ...[text shortened]... All you've posted is unlabeled graphs from unpublished manuscripts. Why do you believe that garbage?
"You;ve seen the science that convinces most scientists that climate change is man made."
That is another lie! Most climate scientists are not convinced climate change is man made. BTW, the correct term is global warming, not climate change. Why do you even waste time reading anything that uses that term? The term itself is a good indication of propaganda. It isn't like the ice ages have anything to do with it. Why do you keep using that incredibly stupid term?????
"I thought we were in agreement that global warming is happening. If so, then we have a problem."
We are in agreement global warming is happening, not that there is a problem. GW is mostly from natural causes and you have presented nothing to indicate otherwise. You have promoted a lot of myths that had to start out as lies. Somebody had to have made up stuff without any science to back it up because they obviously did.
Why should I believe exposed liars over science? If it was in reverse you know you would not either. Why the double standard?
I posted NASA's own graph for sea level rise. Are you claiming it is garbage? Climate models are garbage. I proved that long ago, but you refuse to accept it much like sonhouse refused to accept CO2 lagged behind temps until he could not deny the peer reviewed standard he himself insisted on and I delivered. I have said it many times before and I will say it again, climate models are a guess. They are nothing more than that. There are too many factors overlooked to possibly be accurate and that is why they are not. The only exception is hindcasting and they are not predictions of the future so they are irrelevant.
Confirmation bias has failed you and it will keep failing you as long as you keep resorting to it. One word of truth is worth more than a thousand lies. I would have to be a fool to accept the mere opinions of liars who deny reality. You had every chance to prove AGW with sea level rise and you have failed. That thread still exists should you choose to make a case there instead of digressing into everything but sea level rise. If you can stick to the subject make your case there. All you do is make false assertions based on leftist gossip. Talk is cheap.