Originally posted by Metal BrainMy guess is the increase in CO2 will compensate for any such effect.
Global warming alarmists want to believe the climate models can be relied on. Here is another kind of model of solar activity. Can we rely on this model? Why should we believe their prediction?
http://rt.com/news/273169-solar-cycle-ice-age/
12 Jul 15
Originally posted by Metal BrainIt's not ridiculous, I have seen/heard climate scientists saying exactly that on this topic,
That is ridiculous. There has been very little warming in the last 15 years. Even a climate scientist would never claim such nonsense.
and there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years.
It would literally be impossible for you to be more wrong.
12 Jul 15
Originally posted by googlefudge"there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years."
It's not ridiculous, I have seen/heard climate scientists saying exactly that on this topic,
and there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years.
It would literally be impossible for you to be more wrong.
LOL!
12 Jul 15
Originally posted by Metal Brainhttp://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EF000165/full
"there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years."
LOL!
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/marineocean-data/extended-reconstructed-sea-surface-temperature-ersst-v3b
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/2012.bams_.vose_.mlost_.pdf
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.2297/full
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2015/jun/15/the-latest-global-temperature-data-are-breaking-records
http://www.climate.gov/
http://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-ocean-heat-content
http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2015/jun/03/research-downplaying-impending-global-warming-is-overturned
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X15000564
etc etc etc
12 Jul 15
Originally posted by googlefudgeLOL!
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EF000165/full
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/marineocean-data/extended-reconstructed-sea-surface-temperature-ersst-v3b
https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/2012.bams_.vose_.mlost_.pdf
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.2297/full
http://www.theguardian.com/en ...[text shortened]... verturned
http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X15000564
etc etc etc
http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/06/the_climate_warming_pause_goes_awol.html
12 Jul 15
Originally posted by googlefudgeAre you implying Dr. Singer did not write the article? Go by his logic, not the site that posted it, unless you can prove he never wrote it. You and sonhouse are becoming increasingly desperate.
I post links to science journals and major scientific institutions.
You post a right wing puff piece.
Originally posted by Metal BrainWell, his opinion certainly doesn't seem to be shown any respect there, does it! A clear indication that the scientific community has little respect for him -exactly as I suspected from my many talks with many scientists. There is absolutely no doubt that he is generally disrespected by most scientists that know what he, the moron, is about. You couldn't be more wrong.
🙄
13 Jul 15
Originally posted by humyI have found links that have no respect for the 2 climate scientists you listed. Anybody can do that. The 3rd was not even a climate scientist....lol.
Well, his opinion certainly doesn't seem to be shown any respect there, does it! A clear indication that the scientific community has little respect for him -exactly as I suspected from my many talks with many scientists. There is absolutely no doubt that he is generally disrespected by most scientists that know what he, the moron, is about. You couldn't be more wrong.
Since solar models predict a mini ice age coming there is no reason to curb carbon emissions. Furthermore, solar influence is greater than you admit so you are a joke....unless you want to admit climate model predictions are bunk like I have been saying all along. Any way you slice it you were wrong, wrong, wrong!
13 Jul 15
Originally posted by Metal BrainIn other words, lets go back to 14 mpg cars and no emission controls, who needs all that crap anyway, besides, I can't accelerate to 60 in 4 seconds like I used to, all that emission control is just a bunch of Gore crap.
I have found links that have no respect for the 2 climate scientists you listed. Anybody can do that. The 3rd was not even a climate scientist....lol.
Since solar models predict a mini ice age coming there is no reason to curb carbon emissions. Furthermore, solar influence is greater than you admit so you are a joke....unless you want to admit climate ...[text shortened]... s are bunk like I have been saying all along. Any way you slice it you were wrong, wrong, wrong!