Mini ice age coming?

Global warming alarmists want to believe the climate models can be relied on. Here is another kind of model of solar activity. Can we rely on this model? Why should we believe their prediction?

http://rt.com/news/273169-solar-cycle-ice-age/

Originally posted by Metal Brain
Global warming alarmists want to believe the climate models can be relied on. Here is another kind of model of solar activity. Can we rely on this model? Why should we believe their prediction?

http://rt.com/news/273169-solar-cycle-ice-age/

My guess is the increase in CO2 will compensate for any such effect.

Let me e-mail Al Gore on the internet he created before I answer.

Originally posted by sonhouse
My guess is the increase in CO2 will compensate for any such effect.

That is ridiculous. There has been very little warming in the last 15 years. Even a climate scientist would never claim such nonsense.

Originally posted by Metal Brain
That is ridiculous. There has been very little warming in the last 15 years. Even a climate scientist would never claim such nonsense.

It's not ridiculous, I have seen/heard climate scientists saying exactly that on this topic,
and there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years.

It would literally be impossible for you to be more wrong.

Originally posted by googlefudge
It's not ridiculous, I have seen/heard climate scientists saying exactly that on this topic,
and there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years.

It would literally be impossible for you to be more wrong.

"there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years."

LOL!

Originally posted by Metal Brain
"there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years."

LOL!

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EF000165/full

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/marineocean-data/extended-reconstructed-sea-surface-temperature-ersst-v3b

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/2012.bams_.vose_.mlost_.pdf

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.2297/full

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2015/jun/15/the-latest-global-temperature-data-are-breaking-records

http://www.climate.gov/

http://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-ocean-heat-content

http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2015/jun/03/research-downplaying-impending-global-warming-is-overturned

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X15000564


etc etc etc

Originally posted by googlefudge
http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EF000165/full

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/marineocean-data/extended-reconstructed-sea-surface-temperature-ersst-v3b

https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/2012.bams_.vose_.mlost_.pdf

http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.2297/full

http://www.theguardian.com/en ...[text shortened]... verturned

http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X15000564


etc etc etc

LOL!

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/06/the_climate_warming_pause_goes_awol.html

Originally posted by Metal Brain
LOL!

http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/06/the_climate_warming_pause_goes_awol.html

I post links to science journals and major scientific institutions.

You post a right wing puff piece.

Originally posted by googlefudge
I post links to science journals and major scientific institutions.

You post a right wing puff piece.

Are you implying Dr. Singer did not write the article? Go by his logic, not the site that posted it, unless you can prove he never wrote it. You and sonhouse are becoming increasingly desperate.

Originally posted by Metal Brain
Are you implying Dr. Singer did not write the article? Go by his logic, not the site that posted it, unless you can prove he never wrote it. You and sonhouse are becoming increasingly desperate.

http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-127787073.html

Originally posted by sonhouse
http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-127787073.html

🙄

Originally posted by Metal Brain
🙄

Well, his opinion certainly doesn't seem to be shown any respect there, does it! A clear indication that the scientific community has little respect for him -exactly as I suspected from my many talks with many scientists. There is absolutely no doubt that he is generally disrespected by most scientists that know what he, the moron, is about. You couldn't be more wrong.

Originally posted by humy
Well, his opinion certainly doesn't seem to be shown any respect there, does it! A clear indication that the scientific community has little respect for him -exactly as I suspected from my many talks with many scientists. There is absolutely no doubt that he is generally disrespected by most scientists that know what he, the moron, is about. You couldn't be more wrong.

I have found links that have no respect for the 2 climate scientists you listed. Anybody can do that. The 3rd was not even a climate scientist....lol.

Since solar models predict a mini ice age coming there is no reason to curb carbon emissions. Furthermore, solar influence is greater than you admit so you are a joke....unless you want to admit climate model predictions are bunk like I have been saying all along. Any way you slice it you were wrong, wrong, wrong!

Originally posted by Metal Brain
I have found links that have no respect for the 2 climate scientists you listed. Anybody can do that. The 3rd was not even a climate scientist....lol.

Since solar models predict a mini ice age coming there is no reason to curb carbon emissions. Furthermore, solar influence is greater than you admit so you are a joke....unless you want to admit climate ...[text shortened]... s are bunk like I have been saying all along. Any way you slice it you were wrong, wrong, wrong!

In other words, lets go back to 14 mpg cars and no emission controls, who needs all that crap anyway, besides, I can't accelerate to 60 in 4 seconds like I used to, all that emission control is just a bunch of Gore crap.