1. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    13439
    12 Jul '15 13:07
    Global warming alarmists want to believe the climate models can be relied on. Here is another kind of model of solar activity. Can we rely on this model? Why should we believe their prediction?

    http://rt.com/news/273169-solar-cycle-ice-age/
  2. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    12 Jul '15 16:43
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    Global warming alarmists want to believe the climate models can be relied on. Here is another kind of model of solar activity. Can we rely on this model? Why should we believe their prediction?

    http://rt.com/news/273169-solar-cycle-ice-age/
    My guess is the increase in CO2 will compensate for any such effect.
  3. Joined
    02 Jan '06
    Moves
    10087
    12 Jul '15 17:20
    Let me e-mail Al Gore on the internet he created before I answer.
  4. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    13439
    12 Jul '15 17:28
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    My guess is the increase in CO2 will compensate for any such effect.
    That is ridiculous. There has been very little warming in the last 15 years. Even a climate scientist would never claim such nonsense.
  5. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    12 Jul '15 19:02
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    That is ridiculous. There has been very little warming in the last 15 years. Even a climate scientist would never claim such nonsense.
    It's not ridiculous, I have seen/heard climate scientists saying exactly that on this topic,
    and there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years.

    It would literally be impossible for you to be more wrong.
  6. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    13439
    12 Jul '15 19:12
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    It's not ridiculous, I have seen/heard climate scientists saying exactly that on this topic,
    and there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years.

    It would literally be impossible for you to be more wrong.
    "there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years."

    LOL!
  7. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    12 Jul '15 19:57
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    "there has been a huge amount of warming over the last 15 years."

    LOL!
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EF000165/full

    https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/marineocean-data/extended-reconstructed-sea-surface-temperature-ersst-v3b

    https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/2012.bams_.vose_.mlost_.pdf

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.2297/full

    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2015/jun/15/the-latest-global-temperature-data-are-breaking-records

    http://www.climate.gov/

    http://www.climate.gov/news-features/understanding-climate/climate-change-ocean-heat-content

    http://www.theguardian.com/environment/climate-consensus-97-per-cent/2015/jun/03/research-downplaying-impending-global-warming-is-overturned

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X15000564


    etc etc etc
  8. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    13439
    12 Jul '15 20:17
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/2013EF000165/full

    https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/data-access/marineocean-data/extended-reconstructed-sea-surface-temperature-ersst-v3b

    https://www.ncdc.noaa.gov/sites/default/files/attachments/2012.bams_.vose_.mlost_.pdf

    http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/qj.2297/full

    http://www.theguardian.com/en ...[text shortened]... verturned

    http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0012821X15000564


    etc etc etc
    LOL!

    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/06/the_climate_warming_pause_goes_awol.html
  9. Joined
    31 May '06
    Moves
    1795
    12 Jul '15 20:34
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    LOL!

    http://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2015/06/the_climate_warming_pause_goes_awol.html
    I post links to science journals and major scientific institutions.

    You post a right wing puff piece.
  10. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    13439
    12 Jul '15 20:38
    Originally posted by googlefudge
    I post links to science journals and major scientific institutions.

    You post a right wing puff piece.
    Are you implying Dr. Singer did not write the article? Go by his logic, not the site that posted it, unless you can prove he never wrote it. You and sonhouse are becoming increasingly desperate.
  11. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    12 Jul '15 21:35
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    Are you implying Dr. Singer did not write the article? Go by his logic, not the site that posted it, unless you can prove he never wrote it. You and sonhouse are becoming increasingly desperate.
    http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-127787073.html
  12. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    13439
    12 Jul '15 23:55
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1G1-127787073.html
    🙄
  13. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    625
    13 Jul '15 06:341 edit
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    🙄
    Well, his opinion certainly doesn't seem to be shown any respect there, does it! A clear indication that the scientific community has little respect for him -exactly as I suspected from my many talks with many scientists. There is absolutely no doubt that he is generally disrespected by most scientists that know what he, the moron, is about. You couldn't be more wrong.
  14. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    13439
    13 Jul '15 13:29
    Originally posted by humy
    Well, his opinion certainly doesn't seem to be shown any respect there, does it! A clear indication that the scientific community has little respect for him -exactly as I suspected from my many talks with many scientists. There is absolutely no doubt that he is generally disrespected by most scientists that know what he, the moron, is about. You couldn't be more wrong.
    I have found links that have no respect for the 2 climate scientists you listed. Anybody can do that. The 3rd was not even a climate scientist....lol.

    Since solar models predict a mini ice age coming there is no reason to curb carbon emissions. Furthermore, solar influence is greater than you admit so you are a joke....unless you want to admit climate model predictions are bunk like I have been saying all along. Any way you slice it you were wrong, wrong, wrong!
  15. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    13 Jul '15 15:05
    Originally posted by Metal Brain
    I have found links that have no respect for the 2 climate scientists you listed. Anybody can do that. The 3rd was not even a climate scientist....lol.

    Since solar models predict a mini ice age coming there is no reason to curb carbon emissions. Furthermore, solar influence is greater than you admit so you are a joke....unless you want to admit climate ...[text shortened]... s are bunk like I have been saying all along. Any way you slice it you were wrong, wrong, wrong!
    In other words, lets go back to 14 mpg cars and no emission controls, who needs all that crap anyway, besides, I can't accelerate to 60 in 4 seconds like I used to, all that emission control is just a bunch of Gore crap.
Back to Top