08 Jul '10 19:59>1 edit
Originally posted by sh76And you tend to agree with my words.
That's all fine and good (and I tend to agree with you in general), but that has little bearing on the issue at hand. In fact, you're helping to make my point.
That's the difference with hetero and homo. When people see two men being in love, they think about the sex they have, not the love and romance. Because the love and romance is exactly the same. T hy homosexuals would tend to feel some level of discomfort with the way people look at them?
What you call 'disconfort' I label 'homophobia'. If someone cannot stand see two men or two women hand in hand strollong down the street, then they must be afraid of something (phobia). What is wrong? The hand holderners, or the afraiders?
What are they afraid of?
When I was a little boy and saw a black man for the first time. There aren't many black people in Sweden where I lived. Who did wrong? He, becase he showed himself before my eyes and made me afraid? Or me, who couldn't see a black man without crying? Or perhaps my parents who didn't say that "Get used to it, don't be a wimp!"?
Of course he has the right to be black. Would it cross anybodies mind that it is genetic and it can be cured eventually. Of course not. Neither should the same phobia strike any modern person, wanting them out of their eyesights.
I tend to classify everyone who is afraid of others sexual preference as homophobia, even if he/she is only afraid of their bedroom activities.