09 Apr '14 03:19>2 edits
1. Demarcation Problem — the problem of reliably distinguishing science from non-science. Modern philosophers of science largely agree that there is no single, simple criterion that can be used to demarcate the boundaries of science.
2. Falsification Problem — the view, associated with philosopher Karl Popper, that evidence can only be used to rule out ideas, not to support them. Popper proposed that scientific ideas can only be tested through falsification, never through a search for supporting evidence.
Problems with scientific research
How science goes wrong
1. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying. Nowadays verification (the replication of other people’s results) does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, dubious findings live on to mislead.
2. Too many of the findings that fill the academic ether are the result of shoddy experiments or poor analysis.
3. Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk, it squanders money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds.
4. Careerism encourages exaggeration and the cherry-picking of results.
5. The hallowed process of peer review is not all it is cracked up to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21588069-scientific-research-has-changed-world-now-it-needs-change-itself-how-science-goes-wrong
2. Falsification Problem — the view, associated with philosopher Karl Popper, that evidence can only be used to rule out ideas, not to support them. Popper proposed that scientific ideas can only be tested through falsification, never through a search for supporting evidence.
Problems with scientific research
How science goes wrong
1. Modern scientists are doing too much trusting and not enough verifying. Nowadays verification (the replication of other people’s results) does little to advance a researcher’s career. And without verification, dubious findings live on to mislead.
2. Too many of the findings that fill the academic ether are the result of shoddy experiments or poor analysis.
3. Even when flawed research does not put people’s lives at risk, it squanders money and the efforts of some of the world’s best minds.
4. Careerism encourages exaggeration and the cherry-picking of results.
5. The hallowed process of peer review is not all it is cracked up to be, either. When a prominent medical journal ran research past other experts in the field, it found that most of the reviewers failed to spot mistakes it had deliberately inserted into papers, even after being told they were being tested.
http://www.economist.com/news/leaders/21588069-scientific-research-has-changed-world-now-it-needs-change-itself-how-science-goes-wrong