1. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    08 Nov '20 00:22
    @athousandyoung said
    People keep spreading the flu. Also it can infect animals.
    Same with SARS. Dogs can get it.
  2. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    08 Nov '20 00:25
    @athousandyoung said
    Influenza has a genetic reassortment mechanism that makes it particularly resilient.
    SARS2 is particularly resilient. Can you show the flu is unique in that way? What is your source of information?
  3. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    08 Nov '20 10:47
    [completely off-topic] (Sorry, just couldn't resist!)
    Anyone;
    You have just got to watch the hilarious video I posted at;
    https://www.redhotpawn.com/forum/general/great-satire-of-a-trump-speech.187309/page-1
    of a Great satire of a Trump speech
    [/completely off-topic]
  4. Standard memberAThousandYoung
    Insanity at Masada
    tinyurl.com/mw7txe34
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    26660
    10 Nov '20 22:351 edit
    @metal-brain said
    SARS2 is particularly resilient. Can you show the flu is unique in that way? What is your source of information?
    https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/25048543/

    https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fimmu.2020.552909/full
  5. Account suspended
    Joined
    08 Jun '07
    Moves
    2120
    11 Nov '20 01:52

    This post is unavailable.

    Please refer to our posting guidelines.

  6. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    11 Nov '20 15:11
    @Metal-Brain
    And not much of an ENGLISH reader either. What he said was quite clear to those who are not trolls.

    Trolls like YOU.
  7. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9551
    21 Nov '20 00:13
    @eladar said
    It is just like any other virus.

    Covid can only go away once enough people have gotten the virus and developed immunity.

    Only other option is to be able to quarantine your population and try to snuff it out with lock downs and contact tracing and such.

    Of course with the US there is no way to quarantine the population, illegals can enter the country at will.


    If t ...[text shortened]... S to be done with Covid is enough people getting sick, slowing the spread simply prolongs the virus.
    @Eladar

    That's not how viral transmission works. Smallpox killed hundreds of millions of people and lasted centuries. Polio ravaged humankind for hundreds (if not thousands) of years. It didn't just go away after natural development of immunity. Is there a single example of a virus you are aware of that magically disappeared after everyone contracted it?
  8. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    22 Nov '20 02:30
    @wildgrass said
    @Eladar

    That's not how viral transmission works. Smallpox killed hundreds of millions of people and lasted centuries. Polio ravaged humankind for hundreds (if not thousands) of years. It didn't just go away after natural development of immunity. Is there a single example of a virus you are aware of that magically disappeared after everyone contracted it?
    magically disappeared? Well, that is a high bar to reach. Nobody can prove that, but pandemics do end. The 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic ended. That is not to say it did not evolve into something else, but it is not killing 5% of the population anymore, is it?

    Define "end". Define "go away".
  9. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    22 Nov '20 04:40
    @metal-brain said

    Define "end". Define "go away".
    we want baby sit you; If you have a problem with comprehending those simple words then look them up yourself.
  10. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    22 Nov '20 04:56
    @humy said
    we want baby sit you; If you have a problem with comprehending those simple words then look them up yourself.
    The 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic ended.
  11. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    53223
    22 Nov '20 17:561 edit
    @Metal-Brain
    Sure, with near 700 THOUSAND dead and we are headed that way too. Right now, over a quarter million dead and so much for Eladar's poo pooing the prediction of 260,000 dead. We will be there before the new week is out.

    But of course, being a card carrying troll, It doesn't matter how many die because people die all the time and you don't even look at the idea those deaths didn't have to happen.

    Most of those deaths are 100% on the hands of Trump.

    He KNEW in January C19 was deadly AND airborne and chose to do NOTHING and you HAVE to know that.

    AND even worse, instead of a national program to coordinate the responses and manufacture of PPE, he pitted states against states in a bidding war AND used FEMA to illegally STEAL PPE from that already purchased by states.

    So that is your god king, BESIDES being a total loser.
  12. Joined
    07 Dec '05
    Moves
    22048
    23 Nov '20 08:29
    @sonhouse said
    @Metal-Brain
    Sure, with near 700 THOUSAND dead and we are headed that way too. Right now, over a quarter million dead and so much for Eladar's poo pooing the prediction of 260,000 dead. We will be there before the new week is out.

    But of course, being a card carrying troll, It doesn't matter how many die because people die all the time and you don't even look at the idea ...[text shortened]... PPE from that already purchased by states.

    So that is your god king, BESIDES being a total loser.
    Less than the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic.

    People die. If you want to save lives push for reducing the speed limit. What? You don't want to save lives if you have to drive slower?

    Reagan signed a bill to increase the speed limit that everyone knew would increase deaths. Most of those deaths are 100% on the hands of Reagan and congress. They don't care about the lives of motorists, but they care about people who are too careless to avoid getting the SARS2 virus and dying.

    How about that? They care about certain lives but not others. How do you rationalize that?
  13. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9551
    23 Nov '20 16:22
    @metal-brain said
    magically disappeared? Well, that is a high bar to reach. Nobody can prove that, but pandemics do end. The 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic ended. That is not to say it did not evolve into something else, but it is not killing 5% of the population anymore, is it?

    Define "end". Define "go away".
    You'll have to ask Eladar from the OP about definitions, but obviously there is a distinction between a 'virus' and a 'pandemic'. I was responding to the post about how to get Covid to go away, and that slowing the spread only "prolongs" it (whatever that means). Hygiene, behavioral changes, and vaccines are the general strategies to controlling outbreaks and eradicating them. Viruses don't magically go away after a population infects itself and develops immunity. They just don't (there's an entire scientific discipline studying this). Polio, smallpox and Spanish flu are all good examples.

    https://www.nejm.org/doi/full/10.1056/nejmp0904819

    "A useful way to think about influenza A events of the past 91 years is to recognize that we are living in a pandemic era that began around 1918. At that time, a presumably new founding virus, containing a novel set of eight influenza genes and probably derived from an unidentified avian-like precursor virus, became adapted to mammals... and has drawn on a bag of evolutionary tricks to survive in one form or another... The 2009 H1N1 pandemic virus represents yet another genetic product in the still-growing family tree of this remarkable 1918 virus."
  14. Joined
    20 Oct '06
    Moves
    9551
    23 Nov '20 16:412 edits
    @metal-brain said
    Less than the 1918 Spanish Flu pandemic.

    People die. If you want to save lives push for reducing the speed limit. What? You don't want to save lives if you have to drive slower?

    Reagan signed a bill to increase the speed limit that everyone knew would increase deaths. Most of those deaths are 100% on the hands of Reagan and congress. They don't care about the lives ...[text shortened]... dying.

    How about that? They care about certain lives but not others. How do you rationalize that?
    People die. If you want to save lives push for reducing the speed limit. What? You don't want to save lives if you have to drive slower?


    We already have speed limits, and people still die. Extending your logic to the 'anti-mask truther' crowd, we might as well eliminate speed limits and all other traffic laws altogether since they don't work.
  15. Joined
    06 Mar '12
    Moves
    642
    23 Nov '20 17:042 edits
    @wildgrass said
    People die. If you want to save lives push for reducing the speed limit. What? You don't want to save lives if you have to drive slower?


    We already have speed limits, and people still die. Extending your logic to the 'anti-mask truther' crowd, we might as well eliminate speed limits and all other traffic laws altogether since they don't work.
    it is as if he just cannot handle the concept of doing something that doesn't eliminate risk but is still worth doing because it still reduces the risk so to on average reduce the death toll as opposed to eliminating the death toll. It is as if he cannot accept that, even if you cannot stop all deaths, stopping some of them is still worth doing.
    With his same 'logic', he should insist there be no life boats or life jackets on any ship and nobody should ever put a life jacket on, even when you know the ship you are on is sinking and you could drown as a result of not putting a life jacket on, because there are plenty of past examples of life boats and life jackets failing to save lives in a sinking ship. Sadly, and as I have seen all over the internet, he is far from the only one with that kind of idiotic 'logic'.
Back to Top

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.I Agree