30 Jul 17
Originally posted by @chaney3Try to deviate, just try - you're still a loser. In every aspect.
Here's the deal:
Scientists (atheists) 'learnt' everything from Darwin, while wiser men, like myself, have 'learned' that they are wrong.
Haven't you learnt this yet?
Originally posted by @fabianfnasWhy the harsh words?
Try to deviate, just try - you're still a loser. In every aspect.
Haven't you learnt this yet?
I have clearly made strong arguments in this thread, which you scientists (atheists) are having much trouble debating. That's not my fault.
30 Jul 17
Originally posted by @humyFrom the beginning, my only focus has been a concentration on the facts of the topic at hand.
No, he made the mistake of arrogantly moronically and ignorantly belittling someone for correctly using a perfectly familiar common word. Sorry! No excuse!Two posters have so little else to seize upon in terms of actual compelling arguments,
No, two posters criticize someone for having so little else to seize upon in terms of ac ...[text shortened]... le standards; you say we should focus on content while refusing to do so yourself. Shame on you.
You would do well to join me in that endeavor.
Originally posted by @chaney3No, you haven't. It p*ssed me off when you unilaterally declared yourself as a winner. That's loser talk. Loser talk from a loser christian who think you win only because you don't know better.
I have clearly made strong arguments in this thread, which you scientists (atheists) are having much trouble debating. That's not my fault.
You evade questions that shows your lost point like a loser.
You show ignorance like a loser.
You are arrogant like loser.
You believe your designer sh*it as your religion. Then go to the Spiritual Forum where you will have your religion by yourself.
Here you are just a loser, nothing more.
Haven't you learnt anything?
30 Jul 17
Originally posted by @fabianfnasI have won this debate. If that upsets you in some way then you are at fault.
No, you haven't. It p*ssed me off when you unilaterally declared yourself as a winner. That's loser talk. Loser talk from a loser christian who think you win only because you don't know better.
You evade questions that shows your lost point like a loser.
You show ignorance like a loser.
You are arrogant like loser.
You believe your designer sh*i ...[text shortened]... religion by yourself.
Here you are just a loser, nothing more.
Haven't you learnt anything?
All you can offer is cosmic accidents, luck, rolls of the dice and magical coincidence to explain your 'science'. It is weak at best.
Originally posted by @chaney3Let's see if you have learnt anything.
I have won this debate. If that upsets you in some way then you are at fault.
All you can offer is cosmic accidents, luck, rolls of the dice and magical coincidence to explain your 'science'. It is weak at best.
Give me your best argument and we discuss that argument and that one only.
Avoid this challenge and you are a loser.
When this argument of yours has crumbled then we know that you are a loser for sure.
Do you dare? Or are you a chicken?
30 Jul 17
Originally posted by @fabianfnasOkay jerk, challenge accepted.
Let's see if you have learnt anything.
Give me your best argument and we discuss that argument and that one only.
Avoid this challenge and you are a loser.
When this argument of yours has crumbled then we know that you are a loser for sure.
Do you dare? Or are you a chicken?
I am maintaining that the earth, moon and sun are precisely located, by design. Their sizes and distances from each other not only produce an eclipse, but are essential for life as well. By design.
Now, all science (atheism) can offer to debate this is:
Cosmic accident
Luck
Magical things over millions of years
Random theory
Etc.
Science makes absurd claims when it comes to details. Why? Because science has NO clue how it all happened.
Design. Period.
Originally posted by @chaney3And you know that these eclipses are some annular, some partial, and some total.
Okay jerk, challenge accepted.
I am maintaining that the earth, moon and sun are precisely located, by design. Their sizes and distances from each other not only produce an eclipse, but are essential for life as well. By design.
Where is the design in that, loser?
If you would have a point here, loser, then they would be all perfectly total. They aren't. So there is no design about solar eclipses. Loser.
You gave me the strongest evidence for a designer and you blew it. You know why? Because you are a loser. Nothing but a loser.
Have you learnt anything? No? Because you are a loser, loser.
30 Jul 17
Originally posted by @fabianfnasYour reply is very scientific. And you have represented science as I figured, zero credibility in the face of a winning stance.....design.
And you know that these eclipses are some annular, some partial, and some total.
Where is the design in that, loser?
If you would have a point here, loser, then they would be all perfectly total. They aren't. So there is no design about solar eclipses. Loser.
You gave me the strongest evidence for a designer and you blew it. You know why? Because ...[text shortened]... e a loser. Nothing but a loser.
Have you learnt anything? No? Because you are a loser, loser.
You are no better than humy, twhitehead or sonhouse. All of you want to dispute design, yet offer absolutely nothing in its place except luck, and cosmic accidents.
Your science (atheism) is weak.
30 Jul 17
Originally posted by @chaney3Cry, baby, cry.
Your reply is very scientific. And you have represented science as I figured, zero credibility in the face of a winning stance.....design.
You are no better than humy, twhitehead or sonhouse. All of you want to dispute design, yet offer absolutely nothing in its place except luck, and cosmic accidents.
Your science (atheism) is weak.
Your best argument failed, and you cry.
You are not only a loser. You cry too.
30 Jul 17
Originally posted by @fabianfnasYou seem to need some medication, you are acting somewhat crazy.
Cry, baby, cry.
Your best argument failed, and you cry.
You are not only a loser. You cry too.
I have made a strong case for design, and defeated you. You are unraveling publicly.
30 Jul 17
Originally posted by @freakykbhI formed a good post, and got nothing real in return.
Do you guys live together?
Your comment is not warranted.
30 Jul 17
Originally posted by @freakykbhI have provided sound reasoning for design, and claim victory over fabianfnas, twhitehead, sonhouse, Ghost and humy.
I'm referring to the silly exchanges between you two, not the content previous to the attempts at bit-chslapping.
All they offer is cosmic luck, which is weak. Their atheism has affected their reasoning skills.