Originally posted by @chaney3You say 'no' and then promptly call me a name.
No, the superior evidence of design.
Hippy.
Have s good look at yourself sometime will you please?
Originally posted by @chaney3What do you think has a greater affect on a person's reasoning skills, atheism or alcohol?
I have provided sound reasoning for design, and claim victory over fabianfnas, twhitehead, sonhouse, Ghost and humy.
All they offer is cosmic luck, which is weak. Their atheism has affected their reasoning skills.
The true victor of the thread doffs his cap.
Originally posted by @chaney3This thread has gone on for quite a while now, and I've missed some of the best parts of it, I reckon. Have you managed to refine your argument beyond "it's design because it's design" yet?
16 days until you see design in action humy.
Edit: Ghost, sonhouse and fabianfnas will also see, along with twhitehead.
Originally posted by @chaney3Do the last 16 or so times the moon orbited the Earth without totally blocking the Sun not count as a miracle?
16 days until you see design in action humy.
Edit: Ghost, sonhouse and fabianfnas will also see, along with twhitehead.
Originally posted by @kazetnagorraYes. Now the argument is "It's design. QED."
This thread has gone on for quite a while now, and I've missed some of the best parts of it, I reckon. Have you managed to refine your argument beyond "it's design because it's design" yet?
Originally posted by @soothfastIt's design, and I have proven it, taking down the scientists (atheists) here.
Do the last 16 or so times the moon orbited the Earth without totally blocking the Sun not count as a miracle?
Debate won by me.
1 edit
Isn't it weird how each of these science-ignorant anti-science morons that have taken over the science forum all keep unconvincingly infantilely and idiotically declaring themselves as the "winners" of the science debates when they clearly haven't even presented any arguments? They convince no one and make themselves look as stupid as they are.
Originally posted by @humyI have already defeated you humy.
Isn't it weird how each of these science-ignorant anti-science morons that have taken over the science forum all keep unconvincingly and idiotically declaring themselves as the "winners" of the science debates when they clearly haven't presented any arguments? They convince no one and look as foolish as they are.
Your 15 edits per post don't help your cause.