18 Aug 09
1 edit
Originally posted by KazetNagorraAccordion to Wikipedia it's not just the singularity, but the "region of space in which the gravitational field is so powerful that nothing, including light, can escape its pull."
I'm not really an expert on general relativity, but a black hole is a singularity isn't it?
I'm no expert, though. What was on your mind? That a singularity has no volume? (Does it?)
18 Aug 09
-Removed-When you see a black hole from a distance, then you don't actually see the black hole itself but only the agregation disc around the hole, and the jets of matter. The actual hole is so small you cannot see it from that distance.
A black hole, or rather it's event horizon sphere is sperical. Or if it's rotating perhaps flattened a little, I don't think you can see the flattening thou.
18 Aug 09
1 edit
Originally posted by PalynkaWell, that is just a matter of definition I guess. You can regard the singularity as the "center" of the black hole, but once again I am no expert. But yes, a singularity has no volume.
Accordion to Wikipedia it's not just the singularity, but the "[b]region of space in which the gravitational field is so powerful that nothing, including light, can escape its pull."
I'm no expert, though. What was on your mind? That a singularity has no volume? (Does it?)[/b]
19 Aug 09
One of the many programs circulating on the Science/Discovery channels about black holes was copyrighted 2009 and mentioned that some astronomer somewhere had detected a "bulge" in a black hole, making it less than spherical. Since a black hole can't be seen, I don't know how he came to his conclusion about the bulge, but then again, sometimes I watch these shows just for the background space music...
19 Aug 09
Originally posted by KazetNagorraI am not sure if there is actually any evidence that zero volume singularities actually exist. However, for the purpose of this discussion I will assume we are talking about the event horizon not the singularity.
But yes, a singularity has no volume.
Also black holes are not necessarily spherical - and are almost certainly never perfectly spherical. They probably all have some amount of bulge along their equators (as do most rotating bodies), and some variation too.
I suspect that it is even possible for binary stars to collapse into a single black hole yet still rotate around each other within the hole creating a rotating oblong shape.
I read in scientific american that 'naked black holes' could occur. I believe this means singularities without an event horizon, but I didn't really understand it all.
19 Aug 09
1 edit
Originally posted by twhiteheadIt has been proven for some time that under gravitational collapse a black hole is always spheric in shape.
Also black holes are not necessarily spherical - and are almost certainly never perfectly spherical.
Just checked some notes. This happens in time for rotating black holes. It isn't immediate but it always happen after a period of time.