1. Standard memberThequ1ck
    Fast above
    Slow Below
    Joined
    29 Sep '03
    Moves
    25914
    11 Apr '09 15:00
    What are the implications?
  2. Standard memberThequ1ck
    Fast above
    Slow Below
    Joined
    29 Sep '03
    Moves
    25914
    11 Apr '09 15:042 edits
    If time actually runs backwards it would mean that at some point in
    the future or present, reality or conciousness as we know it must
    justify it's own existence.

    Doesn't it make more sense that we are part of this progression with
    variations of routes being played out than an indiscernable event
    happening in the past?

    Is free will just the boundaries of the game?
  3. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    11 Apr '09 19:36
    Originally posted by Thequ1ck
    If time actually runs backwards it would mean that at some point in
    the future or present, reality or conciousness as we know it must
    justify it's own existence.

    Doesn't it make more sense that we are part of this progression with
    variations of routes being played out than an indiscernable event
    happening in the past?

    Is free will just the boundaries of the game?
    This sounds like something for a philosophy discussion not science. What for instance, has 'justifying your existence' got to do with the flow of time?
    Why do we need justification regardless of time flow? That justification is in the realm of religion for most people (not for me), but the old 'I think, therefore I am' is justification enough. Why does it have to be linked to the flow of time?
    There is also ongoing research into the idea that time is an illusion anyway, a new physics description based on events not connected by time, eliminating time in relativity for instance. So that would make your quest a moot point if true.
  4. Standard memberThequ1ck
    Fast above
    Slow Below
    Joined
    29 Sep '03
    Moves
    25914
    11 Apr '09 20:14
    Originally posted by sonhouse
    This sounds like something for a philosophy discussion not science. What for instance, has 'justifying your existence' got to do with the flow of time?
    Why do we need justification regardless of time flow? That justification is in the realm of religion for most people (not for me), but the old 'I think, therefore I am' is justification enough. Why does it ...[text shortened]... inating time in relativity for instance. So that would make your quest a moot point if true.
    Not at all, it's precisely the point that time doesn't have a direction
    that begs the question 'why'.

    And no, I don't think religion has a monopoly on this question. Do you?
  5. Subscribersonhouse
    Fast and Curious
    slatington, pa, usa
    Joined
    28 Dec '04
    Moves
    52619
    12 Apr '09 03:43
    Originally posted by Thequ1ck
    Not at all, it's precisely the point that time doesn't have a direction
    that begs the question 'why'.

    And no, I don't think religion has a monopoly on this question. Do you?
    Well there is evidence in the MBR of times arrow, and there is new theoretical work that time does not exist at all. News at 11.
    I don't think religion has a handle on it either since all religions are simply the product of man's imagination.
  6. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    12 Apr '09 12:45
    Originally posted by Thequ1ck
    What if time runs backwards?
    What are the implications?
    You wouldn't know it.

    If time runs backward then your brain does runs backward too. If you experienced a backward time backwards, then it would feel like forward.
  7. Standard memberThequ1ck
    Fast above
    Slow Below
    Joined
    29 Sep '03
    Moves
    25914
    12 Apr '09 15:24
    Originally posted by FabianFnas
    You wouldn't know it.

    If time runs backward then your brain does runs backward too. If you experienced a backward time backwards, then it would feel like forward.
    What would the implications then be for the 'beginning' of the universe?
  8. Joined
    11 Nov '05
    Moves
    43938
    12 Apr '09 17:21
    Originally posted by Thequ1ck
    What would the implications then be for the 'beginning' of the universe?
    My answer was based only of the fact that the time arrow is pointing in one direction, and this direction is only a definition and nothing more.

    In reality, this is not the case. The direction of time must be forward of the reason of enthropy. Within small systems where conversions of energy doesn't occur, the direction of time can be either way.

    'Beginning' of the Universe is not such a small system, so the direction of time can only be forward.
  9. e4
    Joined
    06 May '08
    Moves
    25313
    12 Apr '09 21:51
    Originally posted by Thequ1ck
    What are the implications?
    Hmmmm....

    Let me think about this.

    I'll give you my answer yesterday.
  10. Subscribercoquette
    Already mated
    Omaha, Nebraska, USA
    Joined
    04 Jul '06
    Moves
    887760
    13 Apr '09 05:08
    When will RedHotPawn go operational? Could someone please tell me. I heard that Russ and Chris were planning on making it happen soon.
  11. SubscriberAThousandYoung
    West Coast Rioter
    tinyurl.com/y7loem9q
    Joined
    23 Aug '04
    Moves
    24791
    13 Apr '09 06:38
    Someday, God will send His Son in the form of a corpse. He shall be resurrected on the cross, and His Italian friends will rescue Him, lovingly removing a spear from His side and then helping Him get off the cross.

    In doing so, the Father will take away our salvation.
  12. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    13 Apr '09 08:41
    Originally posted by Thequ1ck
    What are the implications?
    Time doesn't run or flow. Time is a dimension. What you perceive as the movement of time is an illusion that arises from the Second Law of Thermodynamics. You simply 'remember' the future far less accurately than you remember the past.

    So you question really makes no sense.
  13. Standard memberThequ1ck
    Fast above
    Slow Below
    Joined
    29 Sep '03
    Moves
    25914
    13 Apr '09 09:191 edit
    Originally posted by twhitehead
    Time doesn't run or flow. Time is a dimension. What you perceive as the movement of time is an illusion that arises from the Second Law of Thermodynamics. You simply 'remember' the future far less accurately than you remember the past.

    So you question really makes no sense.
    So why do we perceive the big bang as the beginning?
  14. Subscribercoquette
    Already mated
    Omaha, Nebraska, USA
    Joined
    04 Jul '06
    Moves
    887760
    13 Apr '09 13:47
    I remember when I was teleported in the matter transformer back to 2009 during an online chess game. That was such a quaint time in my life. Now that I'm only 13 years old and going on 12, I have to leave RHP because 13 is the age limit. I really wont miss playing chess on RHP, though, because my memories and experiences in that place have already been lost. I'm now looking forward to my 11th birthday and getting past this silly monthly inconvenience. Some friend that is!
  15. Cape Town
    Joined
    14 Apr '05
    Moves
    52945
    14 Apr '09 08:28
    Originally posted by Thequ1ck
    So why do we perceive the big bang as the beginning?
    Because of the illusion we customarily refer to one direction as the past with a beginning and the other direction as the future and an end. Surely that is obvious?
Back to Top