Originally posted by jaywillbreaking down the phrase:
What is this thing I hear called [b]Intelligent Design ? What is that all about ?[/b]
a directing mind, using meticulous good judgement and sound thought, planned and devised a subject for a particular purpose.
as opposed to "design" by itself or perhaps "design" modified with "careless."
we could have many ways of presenting this idea.
Originally posted by VoidSpiritYou really thought his question was serious?
breaking down the phrase:
a directing mind, using meticulous good judgement and sound thought, planned and devised a subject for a particular purpose.
as opposed to "design" by itself or perhaps "design" modified with "careless."
we could have many ways of presenting this idea.
Originally posted by sonhouseNo, he's here to try to proove that:
In other words, you are here just to get a belly laugh at all the heathens
1. Evolution means atheism to some people other than Christian creationists.
2. The error of thinking Evolution means atheism, is no different from the error of thinking ID means theism.
Originally posted by twhiteheadBut what do the ID people want? Isn't the ultimate goal of ID'ers to crush evolution, no matter the social cost? Aren't they basically trying to buck the idea of separation of church and state? Isn't that their ultimate goal? To Iranize the US? With Christianity of course.
No, he's here to try to proove that:
1. Evolution means atheism to some people other than Christian creationists.
2. The error of thinking Evolution means atheism, is no different from the error of thinking ID means theism.
Aren't they really saying "ID doesn't mean there has to be god, wink, wink'?
Originally posted by SoothfastRetarded intelligence is not intelligence ?
It's a misnomer. Should be called [b]Retarded Design.
Is that the response you're shopping for in the science forum?[/b]
Hitler would have loved you for your support of Lebensunwertes Leban - and genocide of Mentally Retarded.
&feature=related
2 edits
Originally posted by VoidSpirit
breaking down the phrase:
a directing mind, using meticulous good judgement and sound thought, planned and devised a subject for a particular purpose.
as opposed to "design" by itself or perhaps "design" modified with "careless."
we could have many ways of presenting this idea.
Originally posted by sonhouseRules of atheism "Science":
But what do the ID people want? Isn't the ultimate goal of ID'ers to crush evolution, no matter the social cost? Aren't they basically trying to buck the idea of separation of church and state? Isn't that their ultimate goal? To Iranize the US? With Christianity of course.
Aren't they really saying "ID doesn't mean there has to be god, wink, wink'?
Rule #1 God is IRRELEVANT
Rule #2 If God is relevant, see Rule #1
Rule #3 If God might be relevant, see Rule #1
Originally posted by jaywill1: Where is God?
Rules of atheism "Science":
Rule #1 God is IRRELEVANT
Rule #2 If God is relevant, see Rule #1
Rule #3 If God might be relevant, see Rule #1
2: No, seriously, where is he? If he was everywhere, I think we would have a bit more evidence about it.
3: What do you mean, I'm not trying to see? Didn't I just ask you to show me?
4: You're just taking the piss, aren't you?
1 edit
Originally posted by jaywillTheism 'Science': Rule 1: God is relevant.
Rules of atheism "Science":
Rule #1 God is IRRELEVANT
Rule #2 If God is relevant, see Rule #1
Rule #3 If God might be relevant, see Rule #1
Rule 2: Science is irrelevant
Rule 3: If Science is relevant,
See rule one, go to rule 2.
Page break.
