Originally posted by Bosse de Nage
No, even hunter-gatherer societies have (had) plenty of time for art. Of course you might consider opposable thumbs 'technology'. A good case can be made that modern industrialism has limited creative time and space significantly. Naturally that hinges on what you call 'creative'. Is the latest Indiana Jones art or just a good product? Is there a difference anymore?
Hunter gatherer societies had time for art because they had clothes, worked stone tools and weapons, paints, brushes, medicine, maybe a calendar...
What I doubt they had were full time artists. I know several full time artists myself.
Bonobos, when supplied food and art supplies, become artists. Did you know that?
http://www.greatapetrust.org/media/releases/2007/nr_55a07.php
EDIT - I suppose using your fingernail to draw a nose in the dirt can be considered art, but you get MORE art with science. LOTS more.