where did the universe come from?

where did the universe come from?

Science

Cookies help us deliver our Services. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. Learn More.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158031
08 Nov 08

Originally posted by FabianFnas
But most christians say that you are wrong. You bring a bad reputations to christian people.
Really, you have spoken to most Christians to know that?
Kelly

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
08 Nov 08

Originally posted by convect
hyperdimensional membranes slapping together or something.
That's hot.

Insanity at Masada

tinyurl.com/mw7txe34

Joined
23 Aug 04
Moves
26660
08 Nov 08

Originally posted by Eladar
[b]Nobody on earth can explain it so why bother us with such questions?

I can explain it. You just won't accept it.[/b]
Can you explain where your explanation came from?

K

Germany

Joined
27 Oct 08
Moves
3118
08 Nov 08

Originally posted by AThousandYoung
Can you explain where your explanation came from?
I can explain that. But he won't accept it. 😀

AH

Joined
26 May 08
Moves
2120
09 Nov 08
1 edit

Originally posted by KellyJay
Really, you have spoken to most Christians to know that?
Kelly
As far as I am aware, here hasn’t been any proper statistical study to see what proportion of Christians are young-earth creationists (please will somebody correct me if I am wrong). But the few statistic that I found do seem to indicate that the vast majority of Christians around the world are not young-earth creationists -with the apparent possible exception of in America where, apparently, probably has the highest concentration of young-earth creationists in the world.

I got this from: http://sajun.org/index.php/Creationism

“…. “young-earth” creationism is very much a minority position in Western countries other than the USA.”

And also: http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2006/0131colleges.asp

-but I am going off-topic here.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
09 Nov 08

Originally posted by KellyJay
Really, you have spoken to most Christians to know that?
Kelly
There are statistics about that, KJ, but you don't believe in statistics when it prooves that you are in a minority, do you? You don't believe in science at all, do you?

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158031
10 Nov 08

Originally posted by FabianFnas
There are statistics about that, KJ, but you don't believe in statistics when it prooves that you are in a minority, do you? You don't believe in science at all, do you?
Yea, okay. You polled all the Christians about some topic? I again
want to know how you are justifying your stats, shouldn't be to hard
you have science.
Kelly

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158031
10 Nov 08

Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
As far as I am aware, here hasn’t been any proper statistical study to see what proportion of Christians are young-earth creationists (please will somebody correct me if I am wrong). But the few statistic that I found do seem to indicate that the vast majority of Christians around the world are not young-earth creationists -with the apparent possible ...[text shortened]... o: http://www.answersingenesis.org/docs2006/0131colleges.asp

-but I am going off-topic here.
Off topic or not, thank you for the effort and the data.
Kelly

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
10 Nov 08

Originally posted by KellyJay
Yea, okay. You polled all the Christians about some topic? I again
want to know how you are justifying your stats, shouldn't be to hard
you have science.
Kelly
That's not how statistics work. But I don't expect you to know that.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158031
10 Nov 08
1 edit

Originally posted by FabianFnas
That's not how statistics work. But I don't expect you to know that.
No, you have to have a nice size sample, again, where did you get
your stats, your data comes from?
Kelly

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
10 Nov 08

Originally posted by KellyJay
No, you have to have a nice size sample, again, where did you get
your stats, your data comes from?
Kelly
Since statistics are a branch of science, and you don't believe in science, then me trying to educate you is futile. Many people has tried, and failed. You just don't want to learn.

Want to learn anything about stiatistics? Try Wikipedia.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158031
10 Nov 08

Originally posted by FabianFnas
Since statistics are a branch of science, and you don't believe in science, then me trying to educate you is futile. Many people has tried, and failed. You just don't want to learn.

Want to learn anything about stiatistics? Try Wikipedia.
I believe in science I rely on science, you have it in your head other
wise. I didn't think you were going to produce anything outside of
insults, I'm sorry to say you lived up to your rep once again.
Kelly

s
Fast and Curious

slatington, pa, usa

Joined
28 Dec 04
Moves
53223
10 Nov 08

Originally posted by KellyJay
I believe in science I rely on science, you have it in your head other
wise. I didn't think you were going to produce anything outside of
insults, I'm sorry to say you lived up to your rep once again.
Kelly
You believe in SOME science, I think you should admit. Tell us the science you believe in and the science you don't believe in, if there is anything outside of evolution and the age of the earth in science you actually believe in, tell us so we won't have to guess.

F

Joined
11 Nov 05
Moves
43938
10 Nov 08
1 edit

Originally posted by KellyJay
I believe in science I rely on science, you have it in your head other
wise. I didn't think you were going to produce anything outside of
insults, I'm sorry to say you lived up to your rep once again.
Kelly
BigBang is science. + You don't believe in BigBang. = You don't believe in science.

Walk your Faith

USA

Joined
24 May 04
Moves
158031
10 Nov 08
1 edit

Originally posted by FabianFnas
BigBang is science. + You don't believe in BigBang. = You don't believe in science.
You are not really saying that are you, you actually believe if someone
does not believe in part of 'science' they reject the whole thing? I'd
say every time someone improves how we view things by challenging
something others thought were true and we find that the challengers
were correct it wasn't because they rejected all of science, they only
rejected that part they disagreed with. You it seems to have dogma
that cannot be touched least you brand people anti-science, I guess
that is your version of heretics within the body of science.
Kelly