19 Nov '08 18:50>
Originally posted by Andrew HamiltonOriginally posted by KellyJay
[b]…A billionth of a second is time, if the Bang had not happened YET, . .…
If we agree to define the singularity as the first part of the big bang, then
the big bang HAD already started then. The start of the singularity would be defined as the start of the big bang.
…You seem to be going back and forth on the singularity again,
..… ...[text shortened]... cisely my point in the first place and what I have been saying all along -so what is your point?
We are currently in the singularity now, it was always in the current
state it is in now?
Kelly
Originally posted by Andrew Hamilton
no.
so your point is?...."