Please turn on javascript in your browser to play chess.
Site Ideas Forum

Site Ideas Forum

  1. Standard member PocketKings
    Banned from edits
    23 Mar '07 19:13
    The idea is to close threads that set sub vs. non-sub wars into motion. It's seriously getting old. How many times a year do we have to go through this?

    Might seem silly, maybe I'm the only one who is tired of it.

    Everyone throws out comments once in a while, thats fine, but once again there are many threads being created on the topic at the same time. Or maybe put it in the FAQ that both groups are extremely valuable to the site and harrassment from either side won't be tolerated. (If it already is, my bad)
  2. 23 Mar '07 20:45
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    The idea is to close threads that set sub vs. non-sub wars into motion. It's seriously getting old. How many times a year do we have to go through this?

    Might seem silly, maybe I'm the only one who is tired of it.

    Everyone throws out comments once in a while, thats fine, but once again there are many threads being created on the topic at the same ...[text shortened]... e to the site and harrassment from either side won't be tolerated. (If it already is, my bad)
    Good point PK.
  3. 23 Mar '07 21:01
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    The idea is to close threads that set sub vs. non-sub wars into motion. It's seriously getting old. How many times a year do we have to go through this?

    Might seem silly, maybe I'm the only one who is tired of it.

    Everyone throws out comments once in a while, thats fine, but once again there are many threads being created on the topic at the same ...[text shortened]... e to the site and harrassment from either side won't be tolerated. (If it already is, my bad)
    I agree, all this non-sub vs sub nonsense is really pathetic.
  4. Standard member Acemaster
    Checkmate 2 U!
    23 Mar '07 22:03
    It does get pretty ridiculous.
  5. 24 Mar '07 01:05 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by Bad wolf
    I agree, all this non-sub vs sub nonsense is really pathetic.
    Yep, really pathetic!





    edit; especially when it's taken seriously.
  6. Standard member HandyAndy
    Non sum qualis eram
    24 Mar '07 01:38
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    The idea is to close threads that set sub vs. non-sub wars into motion. It's seriously getting old. How many times a year do we have to go through this?

    Might seem silly, maybe I'm the only one who is tired of it.

    Everyone throws out comments once in a while, thats fine, but once again there are many threads being created on the topic at the same ...[text shortened]... e to the site and harrassment from either side won't be tolerated. (If it already is, my bad)
    The subscriber wars are a foolish waste of time. We're all here to play chess, and that's the binding force that holds all of us together. No more name-calling, no more petty bickering. Save your combative appetites for the chessboard.
  7. Standard member Acemaster
    Checkmate 2 U!
    25 Mar '07 22:07
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    Might seem silly, maybe I'm the only one who is tired of it.
    You have seven votes!
  8. 26 Mar '07 10:00
    what exactly [i] is [i] the point of the subscriber wars,anyway?!?
  9. Standard member Raven69
    Different
    26 Mar '07 15:08 / 1 edit
    Originally posted by beatlemania
    what exactly is the point of the subscriber wars,anyway?!?
    To get all the non-sub scum to become sub.
  10. Standard member Acemaster
    Checkmate 2 U!
    29 Mar '07 01:19
    Originally posted by Raven69
    To get all the non-sub scum to become sub.
  11. 29 Mar '07 06:06
    Originally posted by Raven69
    To get all the non-sub scum to become sub.
    ahh gotcha! so it's just some stuck-up subs demaning that non-subs become subs? if that's the case then it's pointless!

    the reason I'm asking is I only joined a little over 2 months ago
  12. 29 Mar '07 22:51
    looks like we'll have to close this thread down...
  13. Standard member Aiko
    Nearing 200000...!
    30 Mar '07 01:00
    Originally posted by beatlemania
    what exactly [i] is [i] the point of the subscriber wars,anyway?!?
    But but but... war is good for the economy...!
  14. Standard member PocketKings
    Banned from edits
    30 Mar '07 14:12
    Originally posted by Aiko
    But but but... war is good for the economy...!
    Yea, there is a lot of demand for war time products here at RHP. Get busy in those factories.