1. Standard memberPocketKings
    Banned from edits
    Grammar dyslexic
    Joined
    20 May '05
    Moves
    11372
    23 Mar '07 19:13
    The idea is to close threads that set sub vs. non-sub wars into motion. It's seriously getting old. How many times a year do we have to go through this?

    Might seem silly, maybe I'm the only one who is tired of it.

    Everyone throws out comments once in a while, thats fine, but once again there are many threads being created on the topic at the same time. Or maybe put it in the FAQ that both groups are extremely valuable to the site and harrassment from either side won't be tolerated. (If it already is, my bad)
  2. Joined
    30 Aug '06
    Moves
    28651
    23 Mar '07 20:45
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    The idea is to close threads that set sub vs. non-sub wars into motion. It's seriously getting old. How many times a year do we have to go through this?

    Might seem silly, maybe I'm the only one who is tired of it.

    Everyone throws out comments once in a while, thats fine, but once again there are many threads being created on the topic at the same ...[text shortened]... e to the site and harrassment from either side won't be tolerated. (If it already is, my bad)
    Good point PK.
  3. Joined
    23 Jul '05
    Moves
    8869
    23 Mar '07 21:01
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    The idea is to close threads that set sub vs. non-sub wars into motion. It's seriously getting old. How many times a year do we have to go through this?

    Might seem silly, maybe I'm the only one who is tired of it.

    Everyone throws out comments once in a while, thats fine, but once again there are many threads being created on the topic at the same ...[text shortened]... e to the site and harrassment from either side won't be tolerated. (If it already is, my bad)
    I agree, all this non-sub vs sub nonsense is really pathetic.
  4. Standard memberAcemaster
    Checkmate 2 U!
    Checkmating you!
    Joined
    16 Dec '06
    Moves
    42778
    23 Mar '07 22:03
    It does get pretty ridiculous.
  5. Joined
    22 Aug '05
    Moves
    26450
    24 Mar '07 01:051 edit
    Originally posted by Bad wolf
    I agree, all this non-sub vs sub nonsense is really pathetic.
    Yep, really pathetic! 🙄





    edit; especially when it's taken seriously.
  6. Standard memberHandyAndy
    Non sum qualis eram
    At the edge
    Joined
    23 Sep '06
    Moves
    18031
    24 Mar '07 01:38
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    The idea is to close threads that set sub vs. non-sub wars into motion. It's seriously getting old. How many times a year do we have to go through this?

    Might seem silly, maybe I'm the only one who is tired of it.

    Everyone throws out comments once in a while, thats fine, but once again there are many threads being created on the topic at the same ...[text shortened]... e to the site and harrassment from either side won't be tolerated. (If it already is, my bad)
    The subscriber wars are a foolish waste of time. We're all here to play chess, and that's the binding force that holds all of us together. No more name-calling, no more petty bickering. Save your combative appetites for the chessboard.
  7. Standard memberAcemaster
    Checkmate 2 U!
    Checkmating you!
    Joined
    16 Dec '06
    Moves
    42778
    25 Mar '07 22:07
    Originally posted by PocketKings
    Might seem silly, maybe I'm the only one who is tired of it.
    You have seven votes!
  8. Joined
    20 Jan '07
    Moves
    489281
    26 Mar '07 10:00
    what exactly [i] is [i] the point of the subscriber wars,anyway?!?
  9. Standard memberRaven69
    Different
    42
    Joined
    16 Mar '07
    Moves
    7738
    26 Mar '07 15:081 edit
    Originally posted by beatlemania
    what exactly is the point of the subscriber wars,anyway?!?
    To get all the non-sub scum to become sub.
  10. Standard memberAcemaster
    Checkmate 2 U!
    Checkmating you!
    Joined
    16 Dec '06
    Moves
    42778
    29 Mar '07 01:19
    Originally posted by Raven69
    To get all the non-sub scum to become sub.
    🙂 😕
  11. Joined
    20 Jan '07
    Moves
    489281
    29 Mar '07 06:06
    Originally posted by Raven69
    To get all the non-sub scum to become sub.
    ahh gotcha! so it's just some stuck-up subs demaning that non-subs become subs? if that's the case then it's pointless!

    the reason I'm asking is I only joined a little over 2 months ago
  12. Hoagy's Alley
    Joined
    12 Sep '04
    Moves
    41791
    29 Mar '07 22:51
    looks like we'll have to close this thread down...
  13. Standard memberAiko
    Nearing 200000...!
    Joined
    23 Mar '04
    Moves
    207922
    30 Mar '07 01:00
    Originally posted by beatlemania
    what exactly [i] is [i] the point of the subscriber wars,anyway?!?
    But but but... war is good for the economy...!
  14. Standard memberPocketKings
    Banned from edits
    Grammar dyslexic
    Joined
    20 May '05
    Moves
    11372
    30 Mar '07 14:12
    Originally posted by Aiko
    But but but... war is good for the economy...!
    Yea, there is a lot of demand for war time products here at RHP. Get busy in those factories.
Back to Top